This is very bad news

[marin man]

And you're energy would be better spent avoiding the cheap jibes.

this from you :shock: I have seen a few such jibes from you in the past

anyway....welcome back neil.......where have you been :?:

 

[Neil]

And you're energy would be better spent avoiding the cheap jibes.

this from you :shock: I have seen a few such jibes from you in the past

You have? Where?

anyway....welcome back neil.......where have you been :?:

Been?

Not been anywhere, that's my fate, these days. Acksherly, thought you'd been away for a while...

 

[marin man]

I had a small holiday over christmas...it was nice

Havent seen you in these parts for a while neil thats all




mm

 

[JohnH]

Re: marin man

i see for your ill informed rant that your grasp of facts is pretty poor

1) The sale of gold was made after Treasury advise to diversify the nations assets and not hold all the reserves in gold

2) The tory govt privatised the steel industry in 1988

3) the Tory party were enthusiastic supporters of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan

4) I don't understand your jibe about single mothers - obviously the alleviation of poverty is not an objective you seem fit to support.

And finally I can't believe our privatised railways are better than br.

You sound like a man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.

Is anybody else wondering who this post is aimed at? Or what it's replying to? :? :? :?

 

[Neil]

Re: marin man

i see for your ill informed rant that your grasp of facts is pretty poor

1) The sale of gold was made after Treasury advise to diversify the nations assets and not hold all the reserves in gold

2) The tory govt privatised the steel industry in 1988

3) the Tory party were enthusiastic supporters of the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan

4) I don't understand your jibe about single mothers - obviously the alleviation of poverty is not an objective you seem fit to support.

And finally I can't believe our privatised railways are better than br.

You sound like a man who knows the price of everything and the value of nothing.

Is anybody else wondering who this post is aimed at? Or what it's replying to? :? :? :?

I believe to marin man's comments (his 1st post within page 3 of the thread...)

 

[Moqi]

John H

Its aimed at Marin man and his rants full of lies

here here ringo

....erm.....who caused all the bloody problems in the first place........ Wink

and who sold all the gold for jack shit......erm...... Wink

and who chucked millions into unnecesary wars.......erm... Wink

and who is now getting his butt kicked in court for said wars.....erm.... Wink

who sold our steel industries to an indian business man who has now shut them down....erm....... Wink

who has been handing out millions of pounds to single mothers essentially to repopulate a nation.......erm...... Wink

I could go on Rolling Eyes

I have signed the petition so dont think I dont believe this is wrong because I do but it is getting tedious listening to socialists whining Laughing Laughing

of course the other side of the coin is if they dont get sold the government may sell the timber instead and then it will be a lot worse....

public ownership is not always bad.......mostly yes....if the railways are anything to go by but not always.....

I've got pretty sick listening to this sort of bile which is full of untruths.

 

[rosstheboss]

Then don't listen to it!

Anyway, one man's bile is another man's Angel Delight

Didn't this thread start about trees?

 

[marin man]

Full of lies...... :?

labour didnt sell all the gold reserves off at a stupidly low price....

Labour didnt let the indian chorus steel man buy our remaining steel industries because of a large donation.......

Labour didnt lie about the wmd's in order toe enter an illegal oil war......

Labour dont run a benefits system that essentially pays people to have children.........(maybe not how it was designed but how it is abused )

I bow down to your obviously better judgement

 

[Neil]

Labour didnt lie about the wmd's in order toe enter an illegal oil war......

Contentious stuff.

Personally, from what I've read, their info on WMDs was sourced from the intelligence services, wasn't it?

And the "illegal war" is far from clear cut. Whether you believe there was duress, or not, the attorney general nailed his colours to the mast. For the "illegal war" camp, is it the remit of 1441 you doubt?

My opinion, for whatever it's worth, is there's a great deal of revisionist opinions on that. I suspect 1441 has enough imperative and vagueness to not damn the war. And it was hardly just the Labour party in support of the war.

Labour dont run a benefits system that essentially pays people to have children.........(maybe not how it was designed but how it is abused )

Genuine question: how did those benefits work under the previous Conservative governments, and what, if any, real differences were there?

 

[marin man]

I dont recall people getting 500 pounds to kit out their nursery under the tories........

I have always thought that if you cant afford to bring up your own children you are not ready to have any......

Anyway labour voters,I will leave you to fight it out yourselves