This is very bad news

marin man":bl5leknr said:
Oh forgot....still no job silverclaws....still whinging..... :lol: :lol:

Still out with the nasty jibes at people who have not insulted you ? I did give you the benefit of the doubt, pre ban. Post ban you did in your posting seem to be positively different, a breath of fresh air, but now it seems that has gone stale, tell me, is this your history.

But as the saying goes, leopards don't change their spots.
 
At the risk of getting flamed, it is all cyclical, insomuch as one party gets in and spends the pot and then some, before another party gets in and has to fill the pot back up.........but the last lot drained that f****ng pot of everything it had....
 
highlandsflyer":e84hs8cm said:
Palming them off will do nothing but leave the future of irreplaceable parts of our heritage subject to the zeitgeist of the current time..

Most of the land that would be up for privatisation would be relatively new, only going back to WWII or thereabouts.

Still not a good reason for privatising but it's not exactly ancient forests.

And it doesn't equal development.. that doesn't mean that development WON'T happen.. but it's not a given.

And I'm told that public footpaths etc. would have to remain.
 
The Forestery commision makes a thwacking great loss.

Personally I would rather the forests were sold with provisos about public access written in than to see more public money wasted.

I am not saying that everything that is going on is good, far from it.

But the folk with money are not necessarily evil, craven or stupid.

Lets hope that the pain to come will be worth it and the contry will be financially more stable after.

Besides, it's a well known fact that all Tory voters ride road bikes. :wink:
 
Stick Legs":362apkbz said:
Besides, it's a well known fact that all Tory voters ride road bikes. :wink:

Or not :lol:

But you are right.. privatisation doesn't necessarily mean bad.. it could, shock horror, be a good thing.

Still signed the petition because I still believe that leaving them alone would be better..
 
at last.. some reasonable responses. Let work with the facts before we tear the plans apart.

Id' be very surprised if private buyers were to be granted permission to develop the forrest lands. I'd imagine that couldnt be further from the truth, but i'll wait to read the facts before chastising.

The biggest fact is that our countries deficit is HUGE. Like, really really HUGE. Think of a huge number and multiply it by HUGE.
I think its a shame that the coalition will go down in infamy as the party who ruined this/sold that/cut this/made our live really really tough yada yada... yet when they eventually manage to pick the economy back up the cronies will be voted back in, inherit a good economy, and history will repeat itself.
Elton John was right, it's the circle of life.... (but im still standing).
 
KeepItSteel":1zpir06h said:
Id' be very surprised if private buyers were to be granted permission to develop the forrest lands. I'd imagine that couldnt be further from the truth, but i'll wait to read the facts before chastising.

Unless there's some big money changing hands with the funny handshake brigade(s) any change of use for woodland will most likely be met with a rather solid wall.

I suspect the location and local geography would make the majority wholly unsuitable (for developing) anyway.

I still believe it could be a good thing.. dependent on conditions and the way it's handled.
 
silverclaws":w6h5yxnx said:
marin man":w6h5yxnx said:
Oh forgot....still no job silverclaws....still whinging..... :lol: :lol:

Still out with the nasty jibes at people who have not insulted you ? I did give you the benefit of the doubt, pre ban. Post ban you did in your posting seem to be positively different, a breath of fresh air, but now it seems that has gone stale, tell me, is this your history.

But as the saying goes, leopards don't change their spots.

Really sorry to offend you.....but your negativity drags me down......
Your energy would maybe be better spent doing something positive like volunteering to help in a charity shop etc.....other than just complaining about the way you see life....

You are responsible for your own destiny....and if that is sitting about moaning all day then good for you :D
 
I am very dubious of these plans, as I am of anything where the government, any government and money making is concerned, it might come good, then again it might not as private ownership is just that, private and there out of public hands, how many more private land signs will go up and with that, that distasteful grey wire barbed wire cutting the green and barring access that once might have been not even thought of.

Rights of way, one might think they are enshrined in public law, but with that, look at the efforts of the Ramblers association, for rights of way can be lost if it is proved that the right of way is disused and when it's not, it can be diverted. How many bent politicians are there, especially at local level.

Then, lets look at the future here, what will it take for public mind sets to be changed, what will we be sold to make us believe something is necessary, farming, minerals, housing or even fuel, the future could change and those lost lands become what a company, maybe even a foreign company wants for it's own profits.

But is it a slippery slope, the land goes, what next, the beaches, the harbours, estuaries, tidal inlets,....... fishing grounds ?

Like I said in a previous post, the land sell off we are told is for the economy, to that I say, whose economy and whom does it serve.

But let''s not forget the job losses in this, for every person that loses their job, is a family on hard times and hey, benefits possibly and the inevitable impact on the community.
 
It is not a simple thing to remove or re-route a right of way.

If one is damaged, difficult to pass etc., then steps can be taken to prosecute whoever is responsible. If, that is, someone can be bothered to put the time/effort in to set the wheels in motion.
 
Back
Top