kram245":3b5evf1k said:Gerard I took my Kona with splashbacks on a bit of bikpacking last Sunday. The tyres were fine on the dry bridleways , light gravel and sandy surfaces . Bit sketchy on soft sand. Fast on hard pack and no punctures . So actually fine for most things I do on a retro MTB in this part of the country. Your comment about the panaracers sent me to the shed and I found I actually still had my old ones, in 2.1 . However I decided to pick up some 1.8 s and took them to Thetford yesterday and put 20 miles on them. Really liked them and cut into the soft sand better and felt more stable., and fast rolling. Obviously Thetford was very dry with only a few areas of standing water. Just a visual inspection of both tyres , the panaracer fire is a more aggressive tread pattern and will do a job in muddier conditions. Doubtless there are much better mud specific tyres but I' generally stick a set on and use them all year round so I think the panaracers will do for me . Thanks for the heads up .Gerard":3b5evf1k said:minor_LEGEND":3b5evf1k said:Those on Splashbacks are brave or naive.
I find they are fine on hardpack trails with some gravel. I wouldn't use them in deep mud. They seem to suit the conditions here in Suffolk.
Mayhem might well be different given it is west country so no doubt wet and muddy :shock:
All of this is weather dependent of course.
Kam have you tried the 2.1 on the front for better float and cornering out of interest? Back in the day I think that was the philosophy behind it. Skinny on rear to bite & traction.
Yesterday I put on my old green Wild Grippers 2.1 and did my usual circuit on mixed grassy paths and gravel farm tracks. Worked really well, so I'll probably leave them on.
I have Fire XC in 1.8 too so might give them a try too.