Easy_Rider":339h3pfs said:Pipes however are okfewer of those "added" chemicals
...and bongs, chillums and buckets

G
Easy_Rider":339h3pfs said:Pipes however are okfewer of those "added" chemicals
Playing devil's advocate, though, society and the legal system has already set precedent with not allowing smoking advertising near schools, ruling on what sorts of advertising can target children or minors (smoking being one of the first to go, there), and indeed the tobacco industry being regulated on targeting children or minors.technodup":1zpr1drj said:What a load of utter tripe. Firstly it's not 'pro' smoking to have one or two characters out of probably 40 to have the occasional fag. What about drinking? Adultery? Dangerous driving? Drugs? Theft? I'm no soap expert but AFAIK these are all fairly common themes, not to mention many more risque topics.highlandsflyer":1zpr1drj said:Vapid soap operas are not the place, in my view, for a pro smoking stand.
It's the role of parents to educate children in these areas, not television programmes, channels or the state. The sooner people start taking some personal responsibility rather than perpetually blaming someone else for their own failures the better. I'll not hold my breath though.
Reminds me of a comment I heard on Radio 4 recently - can't remember what the discussion was about, now - but the comment was making the point that in past times, smoking was indicative of affluence - or aspiration to affluence - but that's hardly the case, these days.My_Teenage_Self":2ulcupes said:Society has done a good job in discouraging smoking - down from 55% male population to 22% from 1970 - 2007 (stable since 2007), and there has been a corresponding fall in smoking related diseases.