- Feedback
- View
No!
The point of strict liability is that the person in the vehicle with the higher potential for causing death has to assume responsibility for that vehicle. Why should the more vulnerable road user have to take responsibility for the aggressor?
Our current licensing system takes this into account to a certain degree. There is nothing in place for pedestrians. Voluntary cycle training schemes for bikes, and ever stricter compulsory tests going up through the motorised vehicles from scooter to HGV and PSV. This can be taken further by giving better legal protection to more vulnerable road users, and given that most European countrys already have this it would be a good move for here.
We also need the justice system to start taking road violence more seriously and send a message to drivers that it will not be tolerated. The recent case in the West Midlands of the driver being fined £1150 and 8 points for brake testing a cyclist is a good example. Unlike the above case where his driving wasn't even tried. His fine was for a public order offence! So the justice system is saying that it is OK to drive a 2.5 ton vehicle at a cyclist and hit them and block their path, but if you say the C word in public then that's bad!
We do need infrastructure, but there is a lot we can do while we are building it.
The point of strict liability is that the person in the vehicle with the higher potential for causing death has to assume responsibility for that vehicle. Why should the more vulnerable road user have to take responsibility for the aggressor?
Our current licensing system takes this into account to a certain degree. There is nothing in place for pedestrians. Voluntary cycle training schemes for bikes, and ever stricter compulsory tests going up through the motorised vehicles from scooter to HGV and PSV. This can be taken further by giving better legal protection to more vulnerable road users, and given that most European countrys already have this it would be a good move for here.
We also need the justice system to start taking road violence more seriously and send a message to drivers that it will not be tolerated. The recent case in the West Midlands of the driver being fined £1150 and 8 points for brake testing a cyclist is a good example. Unlike the above case where his driving wasn't even tried. His fine was for a public order offence! So the justice system is saying that it is OK to drive a 2.5 ton vehicle at a cyclist and hit them and block their path, but if you say the C word in public then that's bad!
We do need infrastructure, but there is a lot we can do while we are building it.