Syria

Every option is bad. Which is the least bad well that will, always be the other choice which ever one was made.

The fact we are trying to do something rather than just hand ringing. It may and probably will go tips up but it is tips up already.
 
If anything you can do will make it worse, don't do anything.

It's like if someone puts a glass of bleach and a glass of acid down in front of you. A sensible person wouldn't drink either. Instead people are happy to pretend they're forced to pick one.
 
Re:

Or change the situation so there are no refugees?

Who knows what is the best answer.


Cameron deserves a punch in the face for those remarks and this will probably lose him the next election.
 
Re: Re:

Bats":3gv0xle7 said:
Pointing out that his father would be ashamed of him is entirely legitimate. Because it's entirely true..

I admire your ability to communicate with dead people and that they would convey to you, their opinions on their own children.
 
Untitled-206.jpg
 
Re: Re:

Bats":13uq78uk said:
Pointing out that his father would be ashamed of him is entirely legitimate. Because it's entirely true.
Utter bollocks as per. Know Wedgie personally did you?

He would have disagreed with him, as he most likely did on many things when he was alive. But ashamed? Of his own son considering the evidence and doing what he thought was right? I don't think so.

And as for Salmond, it seems there's no low he won't stoop to. It would be true to say Cameron's kid was disabled and died, it wouldn't be appropriate to try and score a cheap political point out of it.

Salmond is a bitter fat loser who really should skulk away into the shadows where he belongs.
 
Re: Re:

technodup":2rtkyh8q said:
Bats":2rtkyh8q said:
Pointing out that his father would be ashamed of him is entirely legitimate. Because it's entirely true.
Utter bollocks as per. Know Wedgie personally did you?

He would have disagreed with him, as he most likely did on many things when he was alive. But ashamed? Of his own son considering the evidence and doing what he thought was right? I don't think so.

And as for Salmond, it seems there's no low he won't stoop to. It would be true to say Cameron's kid was disabled and died, it wouldn't be appropriate to try and score a cheap political point out of it.

Salmond is a bitter fat loser who really should skulk away into the shadows where he belongs.

Why do you have to be so rude? why can't you respond without abusing your fellow forum members, there's no need for it :wink:
 
Describing what he said as bollocks isn't abusing anyone. It's not even in the swear filter.

Now if I'd called him a ******* **** **** then you'd have a point.
 
Re:

You have an awful attitude towards your fellow man and there's many on here would agree with me, there's no need for it, especially during the 'Season of goodwill' :xmas-wink:
 

Latest posts

Back
Top