lewis1641":356ls10p said:
what is the issue with engine braking?
Those that pontificate about it, like to make up catchy, trite, phrases like: "gears to go, brakes to slow..."
There is some rationale behind this thinking, though - over simplistic it may be, but clutches and gearboxes tend to be more expensive to maintain (if indeed you do have to) than discs and pads (or drums and shoes).
I suspect there's also something about the use of gears, too, though that is part of their thinking - when and what to shift to, rather than thinking every gear must be used in sequence.
lewis1641":356ls10p said:
i was taught that way and certainly find it smoother than using the brakes
Which comes back to my earlier point about habits and what people learnt.
I think what it really comes down to is the advanced driver lobby don't expect no engine braking to happen - they don't expect people to descend a steep hill riding the brakes all the way down. My understanding is that they have no issue with the gear selection, and engine speed
controlling the road speed (eg descending steep hils), but they ruffle their wrinkly brows about going down through the gears to slow a car down on level surfaces.
They advocate braking, then - and only then - selecting the correct gear for any acceleration (or clutch, neutral and possibly handbrake if having to stop).
And in fairness, that's the sort of use of gears you'd be expected to make, if you were to take a driving test, these days.