Baroness Warsi (Hats Off To..)

Have to agree Bats.

And yes, the NHS do indeed pay ridiculous amounts for basic things thanks to long term contracts, negotiated poorly.
 
Deliberately negotiated poorly. Whenever the government boffin that negotiates those contracts retires, they usually get cushy high paid do-nothing jobs with the company in question.

The political class are liars and thieves, and even the sons of honest men have grown up just like their friends. Don't trust any of them for a second.
 
Bats":3qg4s6s0 said:
superstar1":3qg4s6s0 said:
In the paper this morning a little girl from Gaza with serious heart problems is coming to the UK for medical treatment. As tragic as her case is, is it really the responsibility of the UK to treat people like her?

Yeah, if you get here you get NHS Treatment.


superstar1":3qg4s6s0 said:
I also heard in the news this week that women with breast cancer in the UK are being denied and refused a drug which could prolong their life for up to 2 years which is a long time particularly if they already have young children. These families have probably paid tax and National Insurance in the UK all their lives, as have their parents, grandparents and great grandparents.

Then it sounds like the NHS needs the ability to spend it's funding in an appropriate manner.

Returning the NHS to an efficient, vertically integrated business model would work. As is most of the NHS' funding gets skimmed off as profit for all the companies they're forced to outsource to.

Fix that, then there'll be plenty of money for cancer drugs and anything else you can think of. Implying we're wasting what we've got on some "undeserving" little girl from a war torn country is just disgusting.

You are fudging the issue, the question is, why don't Muslim countries look after their own?

Anyone with half a brain must realise that its not economically sustainable for the UK government to treat the whole world through the NHS.

Its down to other countries to provide a comparable system for their citizens, not ship them to the UK. This is one of the principals and moral obligations that is conveniently side stepped by them and Baroness Whatshername.
 
superstar1":1uq9wx26 said:
You are fudging the issue, the question is, why don't Muslim countries look after their own?

Why don't Christian countries look after their own?

superstar1":1uq9wx26 said:
Anyone with half a brain must realise that its not economically sustainable for the UK government to treat the whole world through the NHS.

It's a good thing they're not then. Ambulances generally can't drive through the sea.

superstar1":1uq9wx26 said:
Its down to other countries to provide a comparable system for their citizens, not ship them to the UK. This is one of the principals and moral obligations that is conveniently side stepped by them and Baroness Whatshername.

Palestine did and does have hospitals, moral obligation met. But in case you haven't noticed, Zionists keep blowing them up and blockading supply shipments.

So if your hospital gets blown up, or otherwise becomes unsuitable, the moral obligation is to get them to another one.

And, as human beings, we've a moral obligation to help who we can. I'm glad my taxes are helping that poor little girl, and I hope she gets well soon.
 
poweredbypies":tqhi11oq said:
cos we are too busy sorting out all the shit the others have caused.

Sorry, who caused what again?

British Empire conquered 1/4 the surface of the earth. Every few years we put guns in teenagers hands and fly them out to shoot up most of the same places.

Somehow I don't reckon it's some crazy coincidence so much of that 1/4 is a mess.
 
Re:

Chopper1192":9tuvxr4e said:
Hamas are internernationally designated as a terrorist organisation by literally hundreds of other nations because their only manifesto pledge is the destruction of a sovereign and democratic state by the means of unlawful force. Its nothing to do with being friends with anyone, and solely because of their promises and actions.


A sovereign and democratic state eh?
It's a nation that oppresses the people of the areas they illegally occupy (with the support of those "hundreds of nations" who say that the resistance fighters in those areas are terrorist organisations). A nation that commits one genocide after another and turned roughly 6.5 million people into refugees. A nation with an army that shoots its own soldiers when it looks like they'll get captured, then blames the enemy for their death and uses that as an excuse to bomb an entire region to bits. A nation that attacks schools and refugee camps even if the UN tells them more than a dozen times that there is no threat there. A nation whose well-trained army deliberately shoots ambulances and playing children. A nation that gets away with such war crimes with not even the lightest proverbial slap on the wrist.
Hell, I'd try to destroy that too if it were to invade my country.

Of course Hamas pledge the destruction of the state of Israel, what else would you expect? Israel has been stealing nearly all their land, refusing to recognize their sovereignty, destroying their homes and killing/starving/bullying their people for over half a century already.

Your "unlawful force" is only unlawful in the eyes of the few countries who support the Israeli killing machine. Most other people will consider it an extremely desperate form of guerrilla warfare. There are plenty of countries (some even within Europe despite the EU's standpoint) who don't consider Hamas as terrorists but instead as freedom fighters.

There aren't "literally hundreds of nations" who call Hamas a terrorist organisation. Instead it's a small minority.
For starters there are only 196 nations in the entire world (197 if you count Taiwan as a sovereign nation).
Hamas is designated as a terrorist organization only by Israel, the United States, the United Kingdom, Canada, the European Union (15 countries at the time of the vote), Jordan, Egypt, Australia, and Japan. That's 23 out of 196 countries, or less than 15%. If you wish to argue that the EU now has 28 member states, it's still a mere 36 countries (or less than 20%) representing around 1.2 billion people (again less than 20% of the Earth's population).





The UN clearly determined the Israeli borders in 1947 and early 48. However on the very same day Israel was officially founded, they started to claim East Jerusalem, the areas on both sides of the main road to Jerusalem and Western Galilee, areas which were clearly marked as Palestinian soil by the UN.
When the neighboring countries intervened in those areas in an attempt to stop further bloodshed (read the cablegram from the Arab League to the UN on May 15th 1948), Israel declared war on them. They got themselves more weapons, got us to look the other way and then turned the tables on the Arabs, annexing the entire west bank, the Sinai Peninsula, South Lebanon, Gaza and the Golan Heights in the process. They had to give up Southern Libanon and the Sinai Peninsula after peace negotiations, but kept occupying the rest.

The UN security council officially states that the Golan Heights, the west bank, Gaza and East Jerusalem are still illegally occupied, but don't dare to lift a finger. Any action against Israel would prove that they were wrong when they came up with the British Mandate for Palestine in 1922. (be sure to read up on that, it's actually all the UK's fault to begin with. You're the ones who started relocating the Palestinians in 1917 to put jews on their land)
 
superstar1":1vvjbg78 said:
As tragic as her case is, is it really the responsibility of the UK to treat people like her?
No. Where would we draw the line? For reference we have a very convenient line already drawn- our border.
Bats":1vvjbg78 said:
Yeah, if you get here you get NHS Treatment.
Here's the 90 page guidance on overseas use of the NHS. I've not read it all but seemingly some care is provided but is chargeable, which seems reasonable to me. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... oct13a.pdf
Bats":1vvjbg78 said:
most of the NHS' funding gets skimmed off as profit for all the companies they're forced to outsource to.
NHS budget: £109bn
Outsourced contracts value: £2.5bn

Best figures I can find, and given that £2.5bn doesn't take account of costs I think you're out by a factor of 50, give or take. If you can show where private companies are making over £50bn in profit from the NHS I'd love to see it.

Bats":1vvjbg78 said:
Fix that, then there'll be plenty of money for cancer drugs and anything else you can think of.
Supplied by profitable multinational drug companies you don't seem to approve of.

Bottom line is it's our NHS, the clue is in the name. We pay in, we get out. You'd have a very hard sell telling British taxpayers that they are to fund healthcare to people from all over the world. Every penny spent on them is a penny taken from granny's hip op.

Bats":1vvjbg78 said:
British Empire conquered 1/4 the surface of the earth.

Somehow I don't reckon it's some crazy coincidence so much of that 1/4 is a mess.
It's not coincidence, they wanted out. Most of them fucked it up.
 
Luckily the NHS doesn't pay for people's healthcare all over the world, so I don't know why you're bringing it up. Anyone who's in the UK can go to our hospitals, though, which isn't the same thing.
 
technodup":1b45y3mc said:
superstar1":1b45y3mc said:
As tragic as her case is, is it really the responsibility of the UK to treat people like her?
No. Where would we draw the line? For reference we have a very convenient line already drawn- our border.
Bats":1b45y3mc said:
Yeah, if you get here you get NHS Treatment.
Here's the 90 page guidance on overseas use of the NHS. I've not read it all but seemingly some care is provided but is chargeable, which seems reasonable to me. https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/s ... oct13a.pdf
Bats":1b45y3mc said:
most of the NHS' funding gets skimmed off as profit for all the companies they're forced to outsource to.
NHS budget: £109bn
Outsourced contracts value: £2.5bn

Best figures I can find, and given that £2.5bn doesn't take account of costs I think you're out by a factor of 50, give or take. If you can show where private companies are making over £50bn in profit from the NHS I'd love to see it.

Bats":1b45y3mc said:
Fix that, then there'll be plenty of money for cancer drugs and anything else you can think of.
Supplied by profitable multinational drug companies you don't seem to approve of.

Bottom line is it's our NHS, the clue is in the name. We pay in, we get out. You'd have a very hard sell telling British taxpayers that they are to fund healthcare to people from all over the world. Every penny spent on them is a penny taken from granny's hip op.

Bats":1b45y3mc said:
British Empire conquered 1/4 the surface of the earth.

Somehow I don't reckon it's some crazy coincidence so much of that 1/4 is a mess.
It's not coincidence, they wanted out. Most of them **** it up.

Granny's hip op,

The lying UK government is telling us that the NHS is under pressure from an ageing population and not immigrants and health tourists.

This so called ageing population have worked all their lives, hell some have even fought for the country and have paid tax and National Insurance.

This government and the Labour government before make me want to fecking piss!!!
 
Back
Top