It's as cynical as Marlboro man was.
Agreed.
Mind you, what we need here is Retrobike sponsored by Voltarol or Mounjaro
It's as cynical as Marlboro man was.
Agreed.
Mind you, what we need here is Retrobike sponsored by Voltarol or Mounjaro![]()
@john The issue is not resolved, advertising is still quite adult. Can we please have this ad removed? I am in no way interested in being subjected to this constantly on my screen. Do I need to keep my phone hidden from wife and children in order to view retrobike?
View attachment 1013146There are also looping gifs which push far beyond what is acceptable
I dont get why red bull isn't fully liable.
It's not like they can't afford it, and they made it happen.
Maybe the competitors sign some sort of waiver which absolves Red Bull of any liability?
ExactBut the competition moves into more and more dangerous territory, to attract viewers, to attract advertising money, to make the rich and comfortable brand owners feel the thrills.
When do you get off, abandon your career, sponsorship, lifestyle?
It's like doping in the tour again.
You could be ba fantastic road racing cyclist, but if you weren't prepared to dope, many teams wouldn't have you, and you'd be unlikely to win against equals that were.
The organisers have a responsibility to keep the risks and dangers manageable.
Iom tt?
Agostini refused to race there any more after another friend was killed - then it was dropped from official World championship status.
I remember reading interviews with other drivers of the 1968 French Grand Prix when Honda tested a magnesium chassis on the track and it caught fire. They could smell the driver roasting as they drove by. Became the catalyst for the movement towards driver safety. John Surtees had refused to drive it, called it a death trap.There's a ghoulish element of risk-expectation in motor racing too - the organisers are chasing thrills that are expensive for the participants