1992 Rocky Mountain Team Comp

Here's the info I have gathered (from someone on this forum, can't recall who) on the 1992 Rocky lineup:

1992 roster from bottom up.... (they ALL had Ritchey tires at the time, rocky was the ritchey distributor for canada and used a lot of their parts as a result)


#1 Fusion w/ Deore LX group (and this is back when group meant the FULL group, none of this alivio stuff with XT derailleur like you see today), Tange fork (basically same fork as your expert and the hammer used) and Ishiwata butted chromoly frame.

#2 Hammer w/Deore DX group and Ritchey Logic chromoly frame and again that same tange fork, Wolber AT-20 rims

#3 Equipe w/Prestige chromoly frame, DX group, and the same fork shape as the hammer but made from butted chromoly tubing, Wolber AT-18 rims

#4 Experience w/E-stay 7005 Frame and DX group, Tange BigFork, Wolber AT-20 rims, Girvin rockring, and powergrips on the pedals

#5 Stratos w/regular 7005 frame and DX group, Tange BigFork and some more ritchey parts and Wolber AT-18 rims, toe clips on the pedals

(technically the stratos/experience were identical level being the exact same price, but the experience was built beefier as a Woods bike and the Stratos was more an XC race bike)

#6 Expert w/Prestige chromoly frame, XT group, and otherwise parts of the Equipe and basically only available in selected markets... canada got most of them

#7 Blizzard (glacier being the euro version, probably due to some other brand using the blizzard name there) w/Prestige Concept frame, XT Group, and Syncros parts for the stem and bar, Tange Struts rigid fork that year (the syncros fork had been discountinued, and only the Team Comp and Altitude got suspension forks that year), Wolber AT-18 rims

#8 Team Comp which got the aforementioned scott forks, xc-comp MD group, and prestige ultimate frame, same price as the blizzard, Wolber AT-15 rims

#9 Vertex which was the Blizzard with a Ritchey/XT component group and racier geometry, Wolber AT-15 rims

#10 Cirrus w/ E-stay 7005 frame, XT group, syncros stem/bar/post and Mag-20 fork

#11 Altitude which had a prestige ultimate superlight frame that year, Mag-20 fork, XTR group, racing geometry and a significant price hike over the cirrus ($600), Wolber AT-15 rims

#12 Titanium with obviously a ti frame, another $1100 hike over the altitude for basically the same parts otherwise.

Then there were the thunderbolt and tantalus models which were custom-order only frames, handbuilt with all sorts of options. Thunderbolts were brazed, tantalus were tig-welded.
 
Hey folks -Greetings from Nelson BC Canada. I have both a ‘92 Team Comp, and am now building up an Expert, but both did not have the original forks when I got them. The Team Comp (photo below) has a spinner, and Expert came with a Judy that I’m replacing with rigid so my kid has a town ripper. Not doing a fancy build or anything, but does anyone know if they need a suspension corrected fork or not? How does one tell?

2F37CB2A-14A9-4A4D-B2EE-546B7A2D274C.jpeg
 
Suspension Forks are still brand new then (1992) and built for a rigid for frame, the aim was to not add a lot of height by design. Of any fork they would have had MAG21/10 and they are short. (though Scott of course...) so Either a 395 or a 405 would work and I doubt you'll notice much.
That's my opinion.
(The MAG21 had just been released this year)
 
Last edited:
Suspension Forks are still brand new then (1992) and built for a rigid for frame, the aim was to not add a lot of height by design. Of any fork they would have had MAG21/10 and they are short. (though Scott of course...) so Either a 395 or a 405 would work and I doubt you'll notice much.
That's my opinion.
(The MAG21 had just been released this year Thanks super helpful. Have a 395 ready to install. Will post photos once built.
 
Hey folks -Greetings from Nelson BC Canada. I have both a ‘92 Team Comp, and am now building up an Expert, but both did not have the original forks when I got them. The Team Comp (photo below) has a spinner, and Expert came with a Judy that I’m replacing with rigid so my kid has a town ripper. Not doing a fancy build or anything, but does anyone know if they need a suspension corrected fork or not? How does one tell?

View attachment 725889
Beauty Team Comp you have there, it looks to be in great shape, does yours have a 4 digit S/N too? I'd love to find myself an Expert just to complete the 92 missing from catalogue line up lol. Do the Experts also have 4 digit S/N?

As Fluffy says- they weren't suspension corrected in 92 so 395 A-C would be your best bet, but it wouldn't be the end of the world if all you can find are suspension corrected.
 
Beauty Team Comp you have there, it looks to be in great shape, does yours have a 4 digit S/N too? I'd love to find myself an Expert just to complete the 92 missing from catalogue line up lol. Do the Experts also have 4 digit S/N?

As Fluffy says- they weren't suspension corrected in 92 so 395 A-C would be your best bet, but it wouldn't be the end of the world if all you can find are suspension corrected.
The 20” Expert I built up is a longer serial#, F12AA0254 as far as I can tell (hard to read!). The 18.5” Team Comp does have the 4 digit #3688. The 395mm rigid fork I sourced for the Expert is a good match, and bike rides extremely well. The frames seem like identical tubesets, and as mentioned elsewhere, just the last rear canti braze—on on the monostay, is different. Thanks to you all for the fork advice!
 

Attachments

  • D1A994CE-96F0-43D1-9425-5D4A9E6F4C18.jpeg
    D1A994CE-96F0-43D1-9425-5D4A9E6F4C18.jpeg
    846.2 KB · Views: 22
  • ED61C749-FB5D-4672-B34E-E9B79D6AD98B.jpeg
    ED61C749-FB5D-4672-B34E-E9B79D6AD98B.jpeg
    382.3 KB · Views: 20
  • 32ABF7D1-3902-4607-820E-89D198678D62.jpeg
    32ABF7D1-3902-4607-820E-89D198678D62.jpeg
    443.6 KB · Views: 15
  • E2C0DC5C-B8BF-484F-B4E7-C243AF00CFB5.jpeg
    E2C0DC5C-B8BF-484F-B4E7-C243AF00CFB5.jpeg
    907.6 KB · Views: 17
  • D8C60276-9392-4C5D-BC3D-F7EDF1687AA4.jpeg
    D8C60276-9392-4C5D-BC3D-F7EDF1687AA4.jpeg
    914.8 KB · Views: 20
Back
Top