Doesn't that rather assume that bar ends are there to provide a more upright position?brocklanders023":2nta1cui said:Forgot to add that the front end of most modern bikes are miles higher then retro so with the change in geometry bar ends are no longer needed.
Neil":7256kaj6 said:Doesn't that rather assume that bar ends are there to provide a more upright position?brocklanders023":7256kaj6 said:Forgot to add that the front end of most modern bikes are miles higher then retro so with the change in geometry bar ends are no longer needed.
That's not why I use them - in fact I'm probably more slightly stretched out when I use them. It's comfort for longer runs.
As a rough guide to getting their angle right, they were loosely modelled on the angle of the stem.
My first true mountain bike - that I really loved, had survived the first attempt of theft by the powers of evil - and was kitted out with spangly new campag wheels on XT hubs, and it had gone through various iterations of bar ends (Onza, mainly) before being bereft. But just before it's fateful defeat by the seedy powers of the underworld... it sported a pair of truly ace, X-Lite stubbies.Spudly":ycf08say said:I use bar ends, have them on both my rigid bikes, I have blue colour coded bits on my 93 lava dome and that sports blue xlite stubbies, and my daily marin eldridge grade has red bits and you guessed it, red stubbies!
Sounds silly but the change of riding position with them fitted actually makes me faster on my commute to work, and my strava times back this up too!