Today's date: 9/11

marin man":228rb84l said:
At night when the place is empty anything could be done...and if america can keep area 52 :? secret with not much evidence escaping then they could easily cover this up :wink:

Anyway whatever happened innocent people were killed by somebody,wether bearded or not,and that sucks :twisted:

+1

only takes a minute too set a explosive, and the power they have,, they could do anything
 
tintin40":pe6foag3 said:
mikeekim89":pe6foag3 said:
There are many conspiracies. i'll agree but there is one key fact too the story. before plane one and 2 strikes. you can see, on slowed down video's better mini explosions inside both buildings, on both sides. I believe it's a government cover up.

RUBBISH. The government has no need to 'cover up' The bearded wankers are to blame for this. Simple.

Anybody in any doubt about a cover up watch this first.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yx9NRX37SM

Only ONE thing is certain, a lot of innocent people died, the question is who did it?
 
we know who did it and how. I watched it on TV as it happened. cover up, conspiracies. utter rubbish. and insult.
 
tintin40":1xoayvdh said:
we know who did it and how. I watched it on TV as it happened.

Oh yeah, of course - that'll be those "bearded wankers" then :roll: .

And here was me thinking that all they were guilty of was riding singlespeeds.........
 
We'll never know for sure and tbh it doesn't make a sh*t of difference to the families of those that died or the people that lived through it.

Can't remember the name of it but the film by the French film makers that were shadowing a Fire Crew at the time brings the whole disaster in to focus.

RIP all those that died.
 
Too many unanswered questions in my opinion. There are many evils in the world, some are obvious some are hidden, and there are many evil men in positions of power that will do anything to gain more power and wealth. To pull off such an attack a few amateur men could not posibbley do it. My own opinion is that it may have been planned by amateurs, but it was "allowed" to happen for the grander scheme. Think about it now, who owns most of the Iraqi oil now? Its in private US companies hands. The owner of the World Trade Centre complex took out a new insurance policy months before the attack to specifically cover terrorist attacks, he made some money out of that. Incidently, all the building that collapsed (seven) were all owned by the same guy, there were buidlings closer to the towers that are still standing. Many questions. Where are the black boxes? Why was all the rubble taken and ground down? Where is the reckage of the plane that hit the pentegon, or the one that landed in the field? No plane reckage exists. Look at the CCTV footage of the "plane" that hit the pentagon... you tell me that is a plane!

Anyway, I don't know what to believe, but it's certain that its unclear. over 50% of Americans also believe some sort of cover up.
 
[qoute]RUBBISH. The government has no need to 'cover up' The bearded wankers are to blame for this. Simple.[/quote].

Does he mean santa impersonators...hope not as that is discrimination...if he means muslims then that is stirring up racial hatred :wink:
 
brocklanders023":diakhyfy said:
We'll never know for sure and tbh it doesn't make a sh*t of difference to the families of those that died or the people that lived through it.

Can't remember the name of it but the film by the French film makers that were shadowing a Fire Crew at the time brings the whole disaster in to focus.

RIP all those that died.

It does make a difference, how would you feel to know your own government may have killed your relative rather than some nut.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Yx9NRX37SM

It's difficult to question events like this for fear of people thinking you deny that it happened or don't care about the people that died. The human story if tragic and I am very sad about the loss of life. The reasons for it are very important and still relevant today, why are we living under a terrorist threat today, that is real.
 
Easy_Rider":13f8i9yp said:
The owner of the World Trade Centre complex took out new insurance months before the attack to specifically cover terrorist attacks, he made some money out of that.

I'm pretty sure that the WTC had terrorist specific insurance already as it had been the victim of an attack before.
 
Tazio":32is56s9 said:
Easy_Rider":32is56s9 said:
The owner of the World Trade Centre complex took out new insurance months before the attack to specifically cover terrorist attacks, he made some money out of that.

I'm pretty sure that the WTC had terrorist specific insurance already as it had been the victim of an attack before.

The WTC did not have insurance coverage for terrorism. Silverstein took out the policy for terrorism with a double indemnity clause. The ink was not dry on the contract when the towers fell.


I think the previous cover did not cover both towers at the same time, anyway that is one of 100's of questions.
 

Latest posts

Back
Top