Silverfish":2ndrkspx said:I might run a FTW stem on it instead.
ALERT ALERT *** THE STEM YOU ARE TRYING TO USE IS TOO NEW FOR THIS APPLICATION *** END OF ALERT
Silverfish":2ndrkspx said:I might run a FTW stem on it instead.
Silverfish":2t7vmkio said:Not true Martin. I'm pretty sure geoff ringle had quill stems launched in 92, tho i'm not sure how widely available they were. Plus this build will be a mix of components up to 94 so I'm not too worried about mixing years. It's really going to be a case of whatever works/looks the best.
Silverfish":12rblh0m said:Yeah a little bit, the ATAC might work better. I may have to buy your ATAC stem![]()
mkozaczek":27we2p8y said:Silverfish":27we2p8y said:Yeah a little bit, the ATAC might work better. I may have to buy your ATAC stem![]()
It's more or less yours. I still owe you the pics of the 3DV hyperends.
trailboss":3sb3hl7u said:Sweet build, everthing looks to be in mint condition. I would definitely go with the Manitou 2's and Ringle stem, use the A-TAC if you go with the Accutrax, it has the cable noodle.
As I remember it the bike would have been built with Manitou 2's as every mountain biker worth their salt at the time would have specced suspension forks or upgraded to them as soon as they were available.![]()