torqueless":1lm80u6e said:Reamers produce conical holes, not cylindrical ones. Maybe infinitesimaly conical in the case of those reamers you linked to, but conical nonetheless.
No. The reamers I'm familiar with produce conical holes. I jumped to the illogical conclusion that all reamers do so. Glad to be corrected..Pardon? Have you any documented proof of this statement?
I can believe that. "Bicycle" and "26-29.5mm reamer" sounds like a marriage made in heaven..the ONE not conical Reamer I have (26-29.5mm) has paid itself long time ago...
That would be the most elegant solution..The seller of the stem has quite a few 600ax stems and is to look
if he has a 26mm stem
The shimano stems was readily available back then and still are now, the seller of the stems bought a job lottorqueless":16erdy32 said:That would be the most elegant solution..The stems aren't as rare as the bars then...
So what you saying I buy a cheap shit marked to death 25.4 stem and let them do a test run on that first ??TGR":3ohnopbn said:Ian,If you are going with the engineering solution, are you wise using an NOS NIB stem? Maybe worth thinking about that.Richard
IIRC pre '80s Cinelli was 26.4.. TTT was 26 and most else available, Brit or Jap, was 25.4it seems most are 25.4mm which was for the likes of Cinelli bars,