Mechanically probably, aesthetically probably notS1m0nR":143c4ol3 said:The only thing is, I wonder how it would compare to a RRA from the zenith years (which I guess would be the mid '80s when it had a 531c frame and either the Suntour groupset or the Campagnolo Nuovo Record kit). Can of worms in one hand, can opener in the other, I know!!
Certainly back then, either of those groupsets were regarded as being far above where Shimano 105 is now. It'd be interesting to compare how far design and manufacturing tolerances have come though: for example, would I notice a difference if I took all the campagnolo/Weinmann kit off my 1984 RRA and substituted for modern 105, would it be better? Hmmm.
bagpuss":3i39nk93 said:Now with a new owner.There is for me only one RRA.
http://www.flickr.com/photos/74418119@N ... 6004485250
S1m0nR":2weod98s said:That is a lovely bike without a doubt! My preference is for the '80s RRAs, but I think we're really not comparing like for like, except in name.This is hanging up in my garage and I'm currently rebuilding an identical one which has been in the family since new...The 125th anniversary bike certainly has more in common with yours though - in terms of look.
Strictly speaking Raleigh did not make an RRA in the 80s, only the Record Ace(yours), and the Road Ace.
An old timer friend has an example of every RRA ever made - he's a little OCD and they're all mint!