- Feedback
- View
I'm a professional film-maker and I think that it's a pretty good idea from both a technical and aesthetic angle.
In my opinion, your best bet would probably be stop-frame animation. That is a series of stills edited together to give the impression of movement. This would not only compress the relative time, but would also be a hell of a lot easier logistically than filming in real time and then editing down a years worth of footage.
Recently a mate of mine used a compact digital stills camera to record about five days worth of cycling across part of Australia. He attached the camera to his top-tube facing forwards across the bars and set it to take a frame automatically every 5 minutes.
I've previewed the results by manually scrolling through the several thousand images on his camera. It looks very good indeed, especially as the sun rises and sets and captures the movement of shadows etc.
Neither he or I have got round to editing it down into a playable movie format yet but it will turn out nicely I reckon.
Digital technology means that projects like the one you've mentioned are much more accessible than ever. I learned my trade shooting,cutting and splicing very traditional 8mm and 16mm film-stock alongside old fashioned VHS tape and linear editing suites.
Digital equipment has become very user friendly and the real skill now is coming up with good ideas and learning about good lighting, composition, sound recording and narrative construction.
Unfortunately about 99.9% of the stuff created using this technology is downright awful. Still a case of user error.
But I digress...
As dyna-ti mentioned; one thing to look out for with any time lapse project is continuity. Keep your composition and framing identical, and wear the same clothes if they are in frame. Could get smelly but try it out on a smaller scale first then go for it.
And if you do happen to need the services of a film-maker, I charge out at a very reasonable rate with a discount for retrobikers...
In my opinion, your best bet would probably be stop-frame animation. That is a series of stills edited together to give the impression of movement. This would not only compress the relative time, but would also be a hell of a lot easier logistically than filming in real time and then editing down a years worth of footage.
Recently a mate of mine used a compact digital stills camera to record about five days worth of cycling across part of Australia. He attached the camera to his top-tube facing forwards across the bars and set it to take a frame automatically every 5 minutes.
I've previewed the results by manually scrolling through the several thousand images on his camera. It looks very good indeed, especially as the sun rises and sets and captures the movement of shadows etc.
Neither he or I have got round to editing it down into a playable movie format yet but it will turn out nicely I reckon.
Digital technology means that projects like the one you've mentioned are much more accessible than ever. I learned my trade shooting,cutting and splicing very traditional 8mm and 16mm film-stock alongside old fashioned VHS tape and linear editing suites.
Digital equipment has become very user friendly and the real skill now is coming up with good ideas and learning about good lighting, composition, sound recording and narrative construction.
Unfortunately about 99.9% of the stuff created using this technology is downright awful. Still a case of user error.
But I digress...
As dyna-ti mentioned; one thing to look out for with any time lapse project is continuity. Keep your composition and framing identical, and wear the same clothes if they are in frame. Could get smelly but try it out on a smaller scale first then go for it.
And if you do happen to need the services of a film-maker, I charge out at a very reasonable rate with a discount for retrobikers...
