stevevw
Retro Guru
After some comments on my post in RPotM I thought I would reply to them here.
First point was from Montello regarding having the blocks in back to front.
Well I did answer this with
"No they have none replaceable rubbers, closed both ends so universal fit. What do you Campagnolo boy's know anyway
"
Then we had Torqueless
I did not reply but yes the mount is off set to the drive side by 2mm. As the frame is very well made I can not believe this is a mistake and must of had a reason. Any Ideas?
Then we have Woz
Well sorry to disappoint but the tub is fairly well centred, just not as good a picture as I had first thought I guess
The picture below is a bit better showing the tread pattern.
All pictures from my Samsung phone.
And I can assure you the frame is aliened well and rides a treat. I do have a frame checking tool and also a frame building jig although I did build them myself so could be out of bonk
The jig during construction with no false axle fitted.
stevevw":1ztpdgzu said:
First point was from Montello regarding having the blocks in back to front.
Well I did answer this with
"No they have none replaceable rubbers, closed both ends so universal fit. What do you Campagnolo boy's know anyway

Then we had Torqueless
torqueless":1ztpdgzu said:By way of totally off-topic hijack, I can't help noticing that stevevw's Pat Hanlon has a noticeably off-centre brake-mounting hole. I have a 1975 mystery frame with the same feature, and in the same direction- more than a mm over to driveside. Accident or design? Is this an identifying feature of a certain framebuilder? And/or an attempt at compensating for the lopsided geometry of side-pulls?
This is on a 531db frame that is otherwise true and symmetrical, as I assume stevevw's Hanlon is, so I'd reckon the chances of it being accidental to be small. How common is this? Anyone else got one?
I did not reply but yes the mount is off set to the drive side by 2mm. As the frame is very well made I can not believe this is a mistake and must of had a reason. Any Ideas?

Then we have Woz
Woz":1ztpdgzu said:torqueless":1ztpdgzu said:By way of totally off-topic hijack, I can't help noticing that stevevw's Pat Hanlon has a noticeably off-centre brake-mounting hole. I have a 1975 mystery frame with the same feature, and in the same direction- more than a mm over to driveside. Accident or design? Is this an identifying feature of a certain framebuilder? And/or an attempt at compensating for the lopsided geometry of side-pulls?
This is on a 531db frame that is otherwise true and symmetrical, as I assume stevevw's Hanlon is, so I'd reckon the chances of it being accidental to be small. How common is this? Anyone else got one?
![]()
.....just to add to the close examination of the nice picture, it would be rude not to comment, I would
say that the wheel isn't centered judging by more unworn tyre dimples on the NDS. :facepalm:
PS: Or perhaps the tread is not centered on the tyre casing :?
torqueless":1ztpdgzu said:Woz- So are you saying that the tyre might be somehow off-centre and therefore the brake mounting hole is not? I still maintain that, unless stevevw's camera suffers from severe astigmatism, that hole is off-centre, regardless of the tyre!
It's good to know about this stuff. As you can imagine, my frame played merry hell with my attempts at wheel-centering until I realised what was up.
Apologies for my Shimano-free posts..
Well sorry to disappoint but the tub is fairly well centred, just not as good a picture as I had first thought I guess

The picture below is a bit better showing the tread pattern.
All pictures from my Samsung phone.

And I can assure you the frame is aliened well and rides a treat. I do have a frame checking tool and also a frame building jig although I did build them myself so could be out of bonk

