Neil":3kg0g15e said:To be equitable, most dog owners seem to want others to at least have some consideration, when they encounter other peoples' mutts off lead, when they're cycling, driving, walking or whatever.IDB1":3kg0g15e said:In my opinion, if anyone allows their cat to roam freely they must accept the possible consequences of that action.
I think, generally, people should have consideration for others anyway.
dyna-ti":3kg0g15e said:IDB1":3kg0g15e said:Nope.. it's because cats, as stated very recently in this thread, are not designated as domestic animals.
It is also legal for a dog to kill a cat in its (the dogs) own space.
Cats that use my garden as a thoroughfare have learned to pass through quickly.
In my opinion, if anyone allows their cat to roam freely they must accept the possible consequences of that action.
Same must then apply to dogs them being far larger[for the most part] and considerably more dangerous.
Given they they are classed as dangerous and cats not are you saying firm action should be taken and in the instance of a dangerous animal killed on sight.If not either in a garden or on a lead :?
Same what must apply to dogs? Are dogs classed as dangerous?
And on what planet would you be living to glean that I am saying off lead dogs should be killed on sight?