Aero Garbage Wind Resistant a lie

To tell you the truth, after 3 decades of dealing with all sorts of cyclists, most tt riders move swiftly on when a new benefit is seen in a new frame design or component.

The old model is now almost worthless.

This effect is right across the cycle market, but the opposite is the steel tourer, who loves their bike and replaces it rarely, often because it's actually broken.
Plenty in between too obvs.

This relates to the original post.

The wind resistance clearly isn't a lie, but is irrelevant to the bulk of the consumers its targeted at, and so there's a commercial dishonesty at work that the OP finds distasteful - and they are not alone.

@benjabbi gets the vibe too.

Shall we introduce the triathlete while we're about it😉

Can't disagree about the marketing wank being touted and it's diminishing benefits to the average rider. Hardly a new thing though is it? how much difference was there really in Reynolds tubing and the ride quality? We can claim to feel it, but come on, really? does 20g off the frame really make as big of a difference to the rider?
 
Can't disagree about the marketing wank being touted and it's diminishing benefits to the average rider. Hardly a new thing though is it? how much difference was there really in Reynolds tubing and the ride quality? We can claim to feel it, but come on, really? does 20g off the frame really make as big of a difference to the rider?
That's a red flag to @Guinessisgoodforyou

He can tell every reynolds Tube by month of manufacture, wearing a blindfold, in the dark, on a smooth Sussex byway😉

the cycle trade is riddled with this sort of w4nk, but this area is the most extreme.
 
Just to clarify, George broke the road bike record. Disc wheels and Tri bars weren't allowed. But he did everything possible within the rules (Which was complained about and went to a hearing, he won, but they've now tightened up the rules). He'll tell you it was because he optimised every last part, testing multiple options to find the fastest, then training to hold the position.
 
A lot of the sheep are experimenting with 150, 155mm cranks or kiddies cranks…ridiculous…. I always stuck with 177.5’s & still ride that length now as it just works for me…since 1979. & I’ve gone sub 20 for 10miles back in 87 when disc wheels & tribars were not allowed…..
And who's to say it doesn't work for them?
You only find out by experimenting. :)
 
I used to ride 177.5 then dropped to 175 when I started riding again because at the time there weren't any longer cranks immediately available. My new build has a set of 180 waiting to be mounted once the frame has been refinished.
 
Back
Top