Heres the link with all the pics but as its the rear heres that pic[saves jumping back and forth]
http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/viewto ... ernational
http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/viewto ... ernational
hamster":3dn0i6lu said:Keyhole stays, top tube cable routings, never had canti bosses. That's definitely a late 90's frame in my view.
Andy R":1td7uxyr said:It may be my eyes or the camera angle (but I don't think so) but that LH dropout looks all bent to buggery - the inside of the dropout and the inside of the caliper mount should be in the same plane (and at right angles to the wheel spindle) and that doesn't look as if they are (the dropout itself looks bent inwards).
MikeD":39i8f8bd said:The actual brake mount looks bent in that pic too. What happens if you put a straight edge across the two brake mount holes and the dropout?
Yes i understand they didnt do discs,but most bikes have mismatched components.as they never made disc brakes and wouldn't have a display frame with those on
dbmtb":6bzucqmg said:What bike is it?
Up till about 93 there were plenty of MTBs with 130mm rear ends. 135 only became standard when 8-speed came in.