S-WORKS M2 93 FRAME QUERY??

I think the early M2's had 26.8, like the steel frames. Later steel ones have 30.4 and later M2's have 30.9 mm.
 
lapinGTI":3m43bhst said:
Sériously slecialized use 30.9 seatpost. Will most other use 30.8. I remenber when i haved i M2 team 1995.
Open up yo' eyes!

:shock:

It's an early nineties frame sized for a 1" headset (probably JIS), with a 31.8mm seat tube. The oversized M2 frames (34.9mm seat tube, 30.9mm seatpost) didn't arrive until the mid nineties.

Rio":3m43bhst said:
I think the early M2's had 26.8, like the steel frames. Later steel ones have 30.4 and later M2's have 30.9 mm.
Right.

roblobster":3m43bhst said:
my 94 steel stumpy takes a 30,4mm
Your '94 steel Stumpy is a '95.
 
CHASE76":efeph3dr said:
Got a feeling you guys could be wrong? Check out the details in the link below?

http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/viewto ... 0aee54cf5f
If it's a 93, your frame is not a S-Works Stumpjumper - as per your link, only the steel framed Stumpjumper was S-works in that year. I think the decals on your frame are possibly off a 93 S-Works FSR?

Anyway, I'm guessing what you have is either an M2 or M2 FS, and the correct decals should look more like this:

http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q231 ... GP3339.jpg

Can't help much re: the seatpost size, but still a lovely frame.
 
I've just checked my 1993 M2: seatpost 26.8, FD 31.8

Good luck with the build and keep us posted ;)

Cheers,
Will
 
Yes mines the same 26.8 seat tube and 31.8 for the FD. What groupset you running? Any pictures anybody of their M2's?
 
mine was a 2000 stumpie m2 so that explains mine being bigger ;)
Picture004-1.jpg


stubbsy :D
 
Back
Top