GoldenEraMTB
Old School Grand Master
- Feedback
- View
gm1230126":2dlg95rz said:GoldenEraMTB":2dlg95rz said:gm1230126":2dlg95rz said:I would say GT for the quantity of aluminum frame bikes out there probably has a lower failure rate percentage than most brands that made/sold aluminum frames. I think in the early years they had the engineering specs where they needed to be to insure the product was sound. I also know that their heat treating was better than most other brands. The later years especially 97-8 there seem to be more failures on the higher end stuff and for that I blame lighter tubing and mostly Easton. Other companies like Manitou that used lighter Easton tube sets from that 95-97 time period are also known for having had high failure rates. Cracks in BB's and the bottom sides of chainstays are not due to bad manufacturing or materials but abuses from poor landings and smashing the frame on rocks and trees.....come on guys admit it!
forgive me if I think you have a bit of bias![]()
I've always found my aluminum, (m2, so metal matrix aluminum), to be durable. Just sold a bunch of old M2 frames after heavy use, and all still had life left in them.
in the end, it's aluminum, and will crack.
Steel is real....woooooooo :twisted:
![]()
Forgive me back...but in the end all materials have proven they will crack or fail. Aluminum, Carbon, Ti and yes even steel. Again I'll say that crashing, flying and bashing are what shortens the frame life.
no worries...some crack or fail worse than others, and some with a lack of warning

Russell":2dlg95rz said:GoldenEraMTB":2dlg95rz said:in the end, it's steel, and will rust.
![]()
what the hell...I've never said such a thing.
Though I guess it's true :cry:
RTSclassic":2dlg95rz said:But with Steel it will give you a chance to get off before it dumps you on your face, aluminimium and the like tends to be a less graceful experience![]()
true.