ededwards":3kgrh4xm said:Nicely put.
pete_mcc":erlvt5a5 said:ededwards":erlvt5a5 said:Nicely put.
But totally out of context and a toothless argument when all the facts are considered.
But if you want to ride a 1989, rusted to buggery stump jumper with plastic parts then go ahead, I'll take the Cunningham any day.
pete_mcc":14wmp8ei said:ededwards":14wmp8ei said:Nicely put.
But totally out of context and a toothless argument when all the facts are considered.
But if you want to ride a 1989, rusted to buggery stump jumper with plastic parts then go ahead, I'll take the Cunningham any day.
pete_mcc":150m5hax said:ededwards":150m5hax said:Nicely put.
But totally out of context and a toothless argument when all the facts are considered.
pete_mcc":2pebran8 said:Maybe weeman and you can rub the two brain cells together and find it for me.
pete_mcc":22lfm8qa said:The problem with the placement of there brakes were that they were pioneered in Marin where the nearest to mud they get is dust mixing with the riders sweat. Transplant that over to the uk and you end up with a mud clogging, chainsuck inducing nightmare of a brake that would wear through the rims in one decent winter ride.