Ukip candidate: 'Gay donkey tried to rape my horse'

Bats":12saftku said:
I'd like to see how you reach that conclusion. It's not a hyper-inflation scenario, I specifically said if you don't increase the money supply. And neither of us have come to the bit what causes a bread shortage, either... It's specifically only disastrous to people who've got loads and loads and loads of money, and only because they're weirdos who think merely being middle class would be horrible.

I'm not a billionaire, you?

Not quite...this time next year Rodney...

I think in reality what would happen is that proces would rise quicker than wages so that the companies could pay the wages of people who they employ...never mind the fact that production would be slowed until the equilibrium recovers. See the Oil market for how that works....fill up today, because sure as eggs is eggs, the cartel will be slowing production soon.

And then you get a bread/petrol/whatever queue...and a two tier economy, where better off people can get stuff that poorer people can't.

Anyway, why don't you go and start your collective if you know the answers?
 
Bats":tqvmddv7 said:
Anyway, now. The magic thing is about wage/dole-price spirals is that if one happens and you refuse to increase the money supply, what you're actually doing is draining rich people's bank accounts at the speed of sound and rapidly narrowing the gap between rich and poor. No tears lost there.
This is my issue with the equality evangelists. I understand wanting to help the poor, but why does it always come at a cost to those better off, and why should it? The 'gap' is utterly irrelevant. If Branson loses a billion in a deal he's more equal with the doleys but it doesn't change their situation.

At the end of the day generally people are in life where they deserve to be. Most are quick to blame others when they should first look at themselves.
 
technodup":s7hypojr said:
At the end of the day generally people are in life where they deserve to be. Most are quick to blame others when they should first look at themselves.


Like immigrants for instance!
 
Here comes technodup... fresh from a round of taking christmas presents off of orphans for not earning them to tell us the good news of Ayn Rand.
 
Mike Muz 67":3ga7mu1m said:
technodup":3ga7mu1m said:
At the end of the day generally people are in life where they deserve to be. Most are quick to blame others when they should first look at themselves.


Like immigrants for instance!
Aye, they've taken a chance, made a sacrifice and gone for it. Can't fault their side. Now if even a quarter of our doleys could just do the same...

Decide what you want, plan how to achieve it and pay the price.
 
Bats":1m6udq86 said:
Here comes technodup... fresh from a round of taking christmas presents off of orphans for not earning them to tell us the good news of Ayn Rand.
I saw you were back so thought I should chip in. How's the revolution?
 
jonnugget69":2hbzpgu5 said:
Not quite...this time next year Rodney...

I think in reality what would happen is that proces would rise quicker than wages so that the companies could pay the wages of people who they employ...never mind the fact that production would be slowed until the equilibrium recovers. See the Oil market for how that works....fill up today, because sure as eggs is eggs, the cartel will be slowing production soon.

And then you get a bread/petrol/whatever queue...and a two tier economy, where better off people can get stuff that poorer people can't.

Anyway, why don't you go and start your collective if you know the answers?

I don't need to, you've just gone and underlined how capitalism is so rubbish it's relying on the welfare state crutch it lent off the socialists. Take them away, tell it to stand on it's own two feet, and the whole thing falls to bits.

I can't be bothered googling for a really smug picture of Clement Atlee so I guess you'll just have to imagine it.
 
Bats":c83pyeyr said:
jonnugget69":c83pyeyr said:
Not quite...this time next year Rodney...

I think in reality what would happen is that proces would rise quicker than wages so that the companies could pay the wages of people who they employ...never mind the fact that production would be slowed until the equilibrium recovers. See the Oil market for how that works....fill up today, because sure as eggs is eggs, the cartel will be slowing production soon.

And then you get a bread/petrol/whatever queue...and a two tier economy, where better off people can get stuff that poorer people can't.

Anyway, why don't you go and start your collective if you know the answers?

I don't need to, you've just gone and underlined how capitalism is so rubbish it's relying on the welfare state crutch it lent off the socialists. Take them away, tell it to stand on it's own two feet, and the whole thing falls to bits.

I can't be bothered googling for a really smug picture of Clement Atlee so I guess you'll just have to imagine it.

I don't need Atlee, I have your Avatar to look at.
 
My avatar isn't smug. I think they were going for heroic contemplation, maybe looking across moscow with stuff fluttering in the wind, that kind of thing. But definitely not smug.

technodup":3lo2yjlw said:
I saw you were back so thought I should chip in. How's the revolution?

Well, Belarus is nearing it's 93rd year of still basically being the Soviet Union, Nepal is being quietly maoist, the CPC has lead China into being the biggest economy just as they're returning to the mass line, Obama has practically offered to kiss cuba's collective bum live on telly, and I made a red flag big enough to see from space using just half one of your pre-diet underpants. Oh, and can remember most of the words to the battle is going again, most of the time.

All things considered, doing alright.
 
Back
Top