secret_squirrel":18ono0ty said:
A divisive, narrow minded, tunnel vision waste of money
I wouldn't sum it up that way.
I think it's an excellent summary (with the typo corrected.)
I don't think the No vote had anyone credible to represent them. All 3 current party leaders are/were muppets. Anyone else was tainted by the shambles of the previous 13 years of Labour Governments. Eyebrows and Brown FFS. The only way it could have been any worse is if Blair had joined them.
Quite. I bet the No vote would have been even greater had the likes of Blair (who did stick his oar in, by the way) and Cameron stayed quiet at home. And yet... we still voted against the pie in the sky pipedreams of the aggressive "Yes" campaigners. Why? Because most of us have the perceptiveness to understand that what was being claimed and promised was exactly that; we also understand that we have a pretty decent, stable country in a time of major instability on a global scale and only a brainless fool would think it wise to throw away hundreds of years of stability.
The only argument the No camp ever made was around the financials - which whether true or not - came across to me very like blackmail, and whilst if I would have had a vote I would have tended towards No - the consistent campaigning highlighting the negatives of leaving instead of the positives of staying would have got my back up so much I would have been tempted towards Yes - just out of sheer bloodymindedness.
This is a spectacularly stupid argument which was regurgitated constantly over the past few weeks. By the same reasoning it'd be blackmail to tell a blind man he'd better stay where he is rather than walking straight into an open manhole.
I am very relieved this morning (particularly as I actually had a very realistic nightmare that the result went the other way!), but slightly apprehensive as to how things are going to be made worse for us once Salmond and Cameron start messing with things that ought to be left alone.
Now, what's the earliest we can have Salmond and Sturgeon executed for treason as they very well deserve?