dyna-ti":2v1eq7md said:
I put a 100mm on a frame designed for 3" tops
It was horrible
Very twitchy,kept on feeling like the front end was going to wash out at every turn
I've a 75mm on now and it handles so much better
Thanks for replying, Dyna-ti. That pretty much describes my situation at the moment; I've got a set of Z-2s with 80mm of travel on a Saracen Sahara frame that shipped with forks that only had about 20-25mm of travel. Now it's not as terrible as it sounds, because the axle-to-crown distance on the Marzocchis isn't 60mm more than on the factory-fitted forks -- it's more like 25mm. But nonetheless, it does "lift the nose" of the Saracen more than was originally intended.
This has all come to a head because I want to replace my front wheel with one that will take a disc rotor. My LBS can fit a Mavic Crossride no problems, but that's going to mean that I'm riding with a front wheel that's brand new & black and a rear wheel that's silver and 17 years old.
To get a matching pair of Crossrides, I've got to have a frame that will accept a disc brake -- so I was wondering what would work with my Z-2s...
legrandfromage":2v1eq7md said:
I ran my Airborne with 80mm forks - I wasn't happy with the handling.
Yeah, that's what worries me a little...
cyfa2809":2v1eq7md said:
what about 80mm with ahigher a-c
Looking down the thread, I think that's what Neil G is about to mention...
Huntso":2v1eq7md said:
Here it is John with aforementioned forks, think it was a 2004, but can't remember for definite
Thanks again Huntso, that does look like a fantastic bike!

It looks as though one option is to get a frame made at a time when 80mm forks were common and 120mm forks weren't...
Neil G":2v1eq7md said:
Yuo could also use a high stack headset (Cane Creek) to put some extra length on the forks
Now
there's an interesting idea! I'll go and trawl around the net to see what I can see about that...
