Referendum

[REKIBorter]

Snail ice cream would get all the secondary votes and come out the eventual winner. Voters with sensitive teeth ruined their ballot papers.

 

[Easy_Rider]

Where does that human breast milk ice cream sold in Covent gardens stand in all this?

 

[IDB1]

Where does that human breast milk ice cream sold in Covent gardens stand in all this?

In the bin... with the BNP

 

[REKIBorter]

Breast is best. Where are these special interest shops?

 

[cyfa2809]

haha i like the ice cream turnover


but alas im am royally confused
i was never taught one damn thing about politics at school
so im always unsure of where i stand
as i dont know jack :?

it always seemed to me like the upper classes sport :? for the adults

im effing headless, i was going to vote yes for AV now im unsure due to the thread
thats all i know of politics - peoples opions and understandings, not mine

i saw the YES for AV advert not long ago so they are definitely beefing it up (and down with the NO people, not seen that though)

one thing i do feel, it does feel rushed as IDB1 suggested

 

[highlandsflyer]

Clegg should join the Tory party and let the Lib Dems regroup under Charlie again.

Campaigning under the slogan, "Mine's a double whisky, with a whisky chaser. Make that a double too, and while your there another whisky chaser! Where am I? Right, five double whiskies and a straight jacket please."

 

[rosstheboss]

I think the winner should be the party with the most votes, plain and simple.

No seats to win or lose, it's for a GENERAL election after all

 

[clockworkgazz]

Having looked at this again think I prefer the set up we have now to the second choice add on approach tbh I struggle to vote for my chosen party nevermind possible helping the next best(worst) party get a few more votes and potentially get elected. Asked the wife and she agreed and since she is never wrong we might as well end this thread now

 

[Easy_Rider]

I think the winner should be the party with the most votes, plain and simple.

No seats to win or lose, it's for a GENERAL election after all

Isn't that basically what happens now?
But I get what you are saying, the only way that would work is a presidential system with unelected appointed cabinet ministers, I wouldn't like that at all.

 

[REKIBorter]

I think the winner should be the party with the most votes, plain and simple.

No seats to win or lose, it's for a GENERAL election after all

Isn't that basically what happens now?
But I get what you are saying, the only way that would work is a presidential system with unelected appointed cabinet ministers, I wouldn't like that at all.

No, that isn't the current system. See my example at the start of the thread. The party that has a majority in the commons may not have been voted in by the majority of voters.