Lightest Steel Frame?

But knowing what I know about chainstay loads, no way I'd ever make a frame with the stays oval up-and-down at the BB shell, that would be admitting defeat, for me.
Oh NOOOOO !!!!!

Look at those oval chainstays at the bottom bracket ! On a custom lugged steel ! from 2003/04. The builder never mentioned Defeat. Wish I could find the buildsheet with tube selection, but it is packed away - somewhere. My mind thinks these are EL stays. The main tubes were Nemo & EL with an OS down tube. (at the time, my weight was almost 15 stone). Spirit seemed extravagant as it was just coming out as a new tubeset, and weight was not really a primary objective.


By golly, I loved talking tubes and geometries with a couple of custom builders. Always trusting their judgement - based in the subjective ride qualities preferred - rather than trusting my knowledge (mostly personal opinion) of specific tubes.
WIN_20250717_14_27_18_Pro.webp

edit: BTW - I told the builder, I wanted this to be a "Forever Bike" ... for when I shrink a little bit (not much) and am less flexible. But still a 'fast bike'. I think he built me what came to be known as an "Endurance" bike. He gave me a top tube a tad short for future shrinkage (tho still sporting a 125mm stem), a slight head tube extention (reduce the # of wonky spacers), 8cm BB drop for stability, short front center to maintain a quick feel, 100.5cm wheelbase to prevent the handling of a touring rig. I've been happy.
 
Last edited:
Oh NOOOOO !!!!!

Look at those oval chainstays at the bottom bracket ! On a custom lugged steel ! from 2003/04. The builder never mentioned Defeat.
Practically all the best builders are using chainstays that are oval at the BB shell nowadays (major axis oriented up-and-down of course). Any slight disadvantage of that is very theoretical and mos def nothng to lose sleep over. I'm just a crotchety geezer trying to sweep back the tide — it's safe to ignore me.
 
Back
Top