one-eyed_jim
Old School Grand Master
I don't agree entirely. The bicycle industry, and manufacturing in general, was in steep decline when the mountain bike boom arrived. That left the door open for US brands and Far Eastern manufacture in a market that had previously been dominated by domestic manufacture. The lower cost of foreign labour had a big part to play, but there were strong cultural factors at work as well.velomaniac":1dgyvdz5 said:Aw c'mon man, the cultures not at fault its just the economic and political situation in the world.
Numerous polka-dot jerseys have been won by Belgians! That doesn't make Belgium a likely breeding ground for Kings-of-the-Mountains.Englands not an unlikely place for mtb, lack of mountains aside, numerous makes are English.
True, if you put aside the lack of pre-existing cycling culture, decline in manufacturing, and absence of mountains, England starts to look like a perfectly natural place to build mountain bikes...
But do you think that point of view might be just a teeny bit (for want of a better word) anglocentric?
What England did have was an affluent market hungry for aspirational leisure goods, and a struggling domestic manufacturing base desperate to hang on to a dwindling piece of the pie.
I wasn't aware we'd deviated from it.Back to the point,
The Greeks. Israel. Papua New Guinea.who do you not expect bikes from
I've never seen a Greek/Israeli/Papuan mountain bike.and were you pleasantly surprised or not ?
I am interested in what looks (to an outsider) like the absence of cycling culture from Greece. It seems notable among the nations of southern Europe in having no well-known component manufacturer (even Spain had Zeus) and I don't recall any notable road champions from Greece. Unsuitable terrain? Agrarian economy? Cultural antipathy?
I wonder if Andy R could comment.