Surely it would help if you stated the basis on which you believe it to be a Kilauea and not some other model? Not aimed at you in particular, because I know that you're a highly-regarded trader, but I think whenever anybody claims a resprayed frame to be a particular model it's in their own interests, as well as prospective buyers, to give supporting evidence. e.g., a previous photo, the serial number (you can usually read it by shining a torch on it sideways), the weight of the frame, the size of the top tube, a photo of the top tube/seat tube junction.
ringo":27x4tjuo said:Thanks for the tip, torch worked well. serial number is -
5032389 (The initial letter is still illegible)
This to my mind makes it a March 95 frame... which fits with my thinking of a 96 frame.
Measurement and weight later...
I agree that is most likely the number of a 96 model. It wouldn't get assembled, shipped half way round the globe, distributed and into the shops before say June/July - and bikes in the shops by that time are being sold off cheap. Whereas early frame building makes perfect sense in terms of scheduling a factory's output, with all brands wanting new model year bikes all at the same time.ringo":1nujz96p said:serial number is - 5032389 (The initial letter is still illegible)
This to my mind makes it a March 95 frame... which fits with my thinking of a 96 frame.
I don't think so. I for one can't tell just from those particular photos whether it's a Kilauea or a Cinder Cone for example.ringo":1nujz96p said:I'll be honest and say I thought the Kilauea to be so distinctive from other Konas, that it sort of spoke for itself...
For instance it looks identical to this 96 model (note the non-flared seat tube where it meets the BB shell)