anders7777
Dirt Disciple
Dead Rats":2uq62bm1 said:did he just stick it in his bench vice I wonder?
http://www.retrobike.co.uk/forum/viewto ... 37#1251637
Dead Rats":2uq62bm1 said:did he just stick it in his bench vice I wonder?
Does ANYONE bitching on all these threads here over the last 19 months know ANYTHING about Ti?
Dickyboy":2xil4m5g said:Does ANYONE bitching on all these threads here over the last 19 months know ANYTHING about Ti?
Go on enlighten me & in a cool & calm manner please.
cchris2lou":hupg5ahk said:if you dont like people commenting on your bike , dont put it on the internet .![]()
No - YOU tell me why the crimping has totally ruined the frame
Dickyboy":1yr6dbph said:No - YOU tell me why the crimping has totally ruined the frame
Sorry but you don't sound like the type who would listen
cchris2lou":mxvroks5 said:I am no expert on metal fatigue , or anyhting like that , but £975 is a lot of money to spend on a frame which has been damaged like that .
D_XZ":1budteqf said:It's the seller who made the original statement that this modification hasn't affected frame integrity. It's fair for any potential buyers to ask on what basis he can make that statement. Just saying that someone rode it a couple of seasons is hardly a scientific/expert explanation.
How does anyone know how far/hard this guy rides? And if he would notice if the frame was pulled slightly out of alignment etc..
If the frame has been significantly weakened then all we know is that it's had 2 seasons riding to help it get to breaking point.
Answering the (ok sarcastic) questioning by stating that someone else knows nothing about Ti without offering your own credentials or again explaining why they are wrong doesn't help your credibility.
At the end of they day you're the one selling the bike so you should be prepared to back up such strong statements with something more solid. You are asking someone to part with almost a grand here.