yagamuffin":1tjv1efq said:
The water supply should never have been privatised in the first place.
The private companies had no interest in maintaining the infrastructure as it would cost more than the value of the water leaking out.
Only when the Government forced them in to action did we see companies like Thames Water patting themselves on the back for repairing the Victorian water main.
Maggie has a lot to answer for and I for one will be throwing a big party the day she pops her clogs. Evil witch.
I've said for the longest time, that there were plenty of services that shouldn't have been wholesale privatised.
I think it stems from the hubris of some that capitalism and the market economy solves all ills - and it doesn't nor should it.
I know the trite and clichéd arguments about competition and value for the customer - and whilst I think that public infrastructure like this can learn lessons from private business, I honestly don't think society needs the overhead of having to concern itself about profit where things like this are concerned.
People can say what they like about small state and government not being best placed to run things like this - but it's something I keep returning to - several services like this, really don't need the same focus on market economy, or the overhead and / or drive for profit - they just need to focus on their service, and not lose sight of that (ie not like a lot that happened in the public sector, in decades gone by, where big chunks were there as an end in their own right).