Re: Re:
Very much doubt that the fork is original to that bike. The frame is fillet brazed and has no eyelets on the dropout yet the forks are tigged and have mudguard eyelets. Why would a company think a cyclist would only want a front mudguard?
It looks resprayed with random stickers attached and strange esoteric touches like the headtube cable guide that doesn't look to be aligned with the toptube and the cable routing around the BB looks like something a custom builder would do to avoid the mud. In fact the whole thing looks designed to be used in a muddy environment with the TT cable routing (this is a relatively early frame for that). I would doubt that Fisher were too bothered with the mud to do this.
Certainly not any type of Fisher that I've ever seen. I'm going for full custom.
shutter":33y81qnx said:Hmm might be a Gary fisher?? I really don't know? The fork is Tig welded and looks to be ther original one. The lugs on the fork dropouts look quite distinctive
Very much doubt that the fork is original to that bike. The frame is fillet brazed and has no eyelets on the dropout yet the forks are tigged and have mudguard eyelets. Why would a company think a cyclist would only want a front mudguard?
It looks resprayed with random stickers attached and strange esoteric touches like the headtube cable guide that doesn't look to be aligned with the toptube and the cable routing around the BB looks like something a custom builder would do to avoid the mud. In fact the whole thing looks designed to be used in a muddy environment with the TT cable routing (this is a relatively early frame for that). I would doubt that Fisher were too bothered with the mud to do this.
Certainly not any type of Fisher that I've ever seen. I'm going for full custom.