Dynatech and UGLI fork question

ultrazenith

Senior Retro Guru
Feedback
View
I know there are many knowledgeable people on here, so I have a question that I've not been able to find any answer to thus far using google. Why were there two versions of the Raleigh special products division UGLI fork? The titanium one and the steel one. The Ti ones are said to be light, has anybody ever weighed one and could tell me approximately how much a pair of these (or the steel ones) would weigh?
 
I bought a Torus in 1994, full welded titanium frame, originally stx group for the price of £650 is I think, though I had the shop rebuild it with xt. The bike came with an U.G.L.I fork which I reckon was made of steel. I'm guessing the steel version was more budget orientated.
 
OK, I managed to work out that with the death of Dynatech in 1995, the Mtrax Ti 3000 and Ti 4000 got UGLI forks with steel or ti blades, respectively.

Looking at the catalogues, now I understand why Raleigh's special products flopped after the mid 90s. The bikes were actually pretty good, but the way they were marketed was awful. I can vaguely recall looking at the 94 and 95 M Trax brochures at the time, hoping to see something awesome to outdo the 94 or 93 Dynatech ranges, but it was all quite unappealing to somebody who already had a slight idea of what other brands were doing. Major turn-offs were:

* The Raleigh head badge associated the range with the gas-pipe bikes at the bottom of the range.

* The catalogue's bullet points said weird or meaningless things.

* The riders depicted in the brochures were kitted out in really naff looking clothes, glasses and helmets.

* The name M Trax was much less cool than Dynatech, and the model names were boring and ludicrous (might as well have started the number from one trillion instead of 1000).

* Despite the nice light frames, somehow they still managed to be a bit overweight compared to contemporary welded steel frames at the same price point, probably due to steel bars, stems, seatposts and bar ends (?)

There were plenty of good points, though, which I probably don't have to detail.

(thanks to the wonderful catalogue scans by fluffychicken)
 
Yes the steel ones would have been cheaper.
I might have the weight of my ti ones I used to own, I'll have to check.
 
thesurfbus":yrwtwvhx said:
Think it was £40, but it was 5 years ago, wish I hadn't sold it now!

At a guess, I'd say a pair of ULGIs would be worth more than the MT3 frame they'd originally have been sold with.
 
Back
Top