Choice of SLX vs. EL...

bikenut2010

Senior Retro Guru
Columbus framesets: Any advice appreciated , these would be NOS or used frames...


:D
 

Attachments

  • SLX.webp
    SLX.webp
    10.2 KB · Views: 556
  • EL.webp
    EL.webp
    9.8 KB · Views: 556
EL has thinner walls so is more prone to denting. But my DeRosa EL is the best road bike I own - so as long as you don't plan on dropping anything on it - go fo the EL.
 
If you're lightweight and not a big gear masher go for the EL - it's very light and thin. For durability, strength and rigidity go for the SLX.

Mark.
 
daccordimark":30yg9nt0 said:
If you're lightweight and not a big gear masher go for the EL - it's very light and thin. For durability, strength and rigidity go for the SLX.

Mark.
Hmmm i'm not light! (85 kg ) SLX safer bet?
 
Is this EL-OS or EL? It makes a big difference for somebody your size.

EL in its various guises and SLX are all relatively dated tubesets, so none of them is the equal of the latest heat-treated tubesets, so I don't think it really makes any competitive difference that would affect your own performance. I would therefore lean to the SLX insofar as it is more robust.
 
Citoyen du monde":2l9zducs said:
Is this EL-OS or EL? It makes a big difference for somebody your size.

EL in its various guises and SLX are all relatively dated tubesets, so none of them is the equal of the latest heat-treated tubesets, so I don't think it really makes any competitive difference that would affect your own performance. I would therefore lean to the SLX insofar as it is more robust.


Thanks that sound like a plan, Is this a Cinelli bracket shell? it looks reinforced like a Cinelli.

What would be the equivalent of SLX in a modern tubeset? How about Thron? is that lighter than SLX?
 

Attachments

  • IMG_2012_2.webp
    IMG_2012_2.webp
    11.9 KB · Views: 442

Latest posts

Back
Top