St John Widget":1pl5mpjq said:At what point does a bike become retro and therefore worthy of attention?
That is the million dollar question isn't it?
To me, Retro is a state of mind.

St John Widget":1pl5mpjq said:At what point does a bike become retro and therefore worthy of attention?
wickedwheels":ely1vjhy said:I LOVE walking into a bike shop and having the shop rat look give my bike a puzzled look or totally ignore it. I think it highlights the ignorance and lack of knowledge of a lot of shops ........ I use my bike as a gauge of how good the shop is.
you want a 1" threaded headset for a mountain bike? It can't be a very good bike
Wold Ranger":167atr6g said:In a single word, WEIGHT (Plus old bikes have: Soul, Character, pretty looks and you need skills to ride them well) or the lack of weight with retro. Even the Trek 69r weighes 25 pounds plus and it's a single speed!! The whole concept of a MOUNTAIN bike is it can be ridden up a very steep hill off road. If it's heavy this is no fun, particularly for light weights like me. I am an x fell runner and CX racer, so carrying a bike is also a desire, (why ride up a hill when you can run up it easier and faster beats me, so I will shoulder my bike and run up steep or rocky inclines and at sub 20 pounds that's easy) try carrying an awkwardly shaped 30 pound plus bike up a cliff wall![/b]
cchris2lou":3o08d2qa said:Yep , a friend is france is a Scott dealer , and I was able to try his Scott Spark LTD . It is an incredible machine . It goes like a rocket up and down .but at nearly £5000 , very expensive .