FluffyChicken":32abtlqk said:
dyna-ti":32abtlqk said:
Canti- rubbish
V brakes- semi-rubbish
Hydraulic- Theres a reason theyre fitted to 99% of everything with wheels
Is that your cost comparison ;-)
Cost comparison
Well canti's would be the cheapest option though pads would add up as you need to use more effort on braking so could wear out quicker,plus theyre not that effective,especially in the wet.
Given mtb'ing is mainly off in the woods where the mud lives,canti's will have a hard life and the grit will wear the pads out quickly
The life span of the rim itself is greatly reduced,again de to mud and grit
V's are considerably better in braking in wet or muddy conditions,although thats more to do with the high leverage, and as such suffers the same wear issues as the canti's
I remember the name V's were given at their introduction- 'Rim Crushers'
V pads are thinner and wore quicker than canti.
Rims suffer also,but as said,it will be a long time before you wear out the rim.
Discs
As we know,works everywhere and in all conditions. The pads,though expensive, last longer as the compound used is with performance and longevity in mind,whereas maybe V's and for sure canti's are just shaped blocks of rubber
but of course the total outlay is considerably more.
If pottering with the grands on a canal path then canti's would be the cheapest option by far.
V's are now very cheap,due to more discs being fitted,you can get top of the range performance wise for 1/4 of their new price.
To sum up id say V's where the most cost effective solution to braking ,with both initial cost and of replacement pads. Ceramic rims and ceramic pads would increase life and performance but ups the outlay