Retrobike Forum Index

It is currently Fri Oct 21, 2016 1:59 am

* Login   * Register * Search  * FAQ

Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2
Author Message
 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 7:47 pm 
rBoTM Winner
rBoTM Winner

Joined: Sat Aug 28, 2010 3:44 pm
Posts: 422
Location: at my computer
Old Ned wrote:
The dimensions I gave (30mm/120 for 5 and 35mm/125 for 6) were taken from an article by Mike Mullett in an early 70's 'Cycling' when Regina blocks were the norm for most riders. Mike most probably used the dimensions required for these as his 'standards' as in the accompanying article he describes the various Regina body/sprocket types and possible combinations to suit varying requirements.

Are you saying that if using another brand of block these dimensions may not necessarily be correct?

120 mm outside width between outer surfaces of the locknuts were more or less standard until the 1970's. Generally speaking this was designed for freewheels with a maximum of 5 cogs. Suntour, and later others too, however made a "narrow" version that allowed one to fit 6 cogs in the space of 5 "normal" cogs of for example Regina. Likewise it was possible to play around a bit with cones, washers and locknuts to sometimes, with some frames, fit a "regular" six cog freewheel into a frame spaced for 120 mm spacing. By the end of the 70's virtually everybody had switched over from 120 mm spacing to 126 spacing. This was ostensibly to allow for 6 cog freewheel spacing, but again here, some manufacturers were able to fit in an extra cog in the same space, likewise with some fiddling, you could also fit in extra cogs by switching out the cones, washers and locknuts. Towards the end of the 80s everybody was passing over to 130 mm spacing, which has since become standard for racing bikes (MTB and tandems have their own sizes).

Each of these measurements is made up of the distance between the flanges, plus the space on each side of the flanges and the outer surface of the locknuts. The more cogs you would like to fit on the hub, the more space you need in the space between the right side flange and the right locknut. If you keep the total distance between locknuts unvaried and move the flanges closer in, you will be able to have more space available for cogs. If you measure vintage hubs, you will see that many have been messed around with. Some formerly 120 mm hubs are now 123 mm with 6 cogs. Some are now 128 mm...

 Post subject:
PostPosted: Fri Nov 12, 2010 8:50 pm 

Joined: Tue Oct 19, 2010 9:16 pm
Posts: 7
Location: Leeds
Hamster - Re - (IF you have a reasonably conservative cog size, you stand a good chance of getting away with it...) Plan! I will stick with 28 tooth max, seen some crazy old suntour freewheels with 38! They're just not gonna fit. Cheers

I will have to look into these hubs a bit more and see if they are actually 120mm spaced out to 126mm and re dished. If so I may be able to stick with 120mm spacing and get them re re dished back to 120 spacing and work from there.
Learned so much just trying to upgrade some rubbish parts on a rusty old bike! I knew it would not be cheap and that it was gonna be a big job but not that it could be so complicated/confusing. Every time i think i have an answer it all goes in the air again. Will keep slogging on.

Thanks to all of you, Alex

Display posts from previous:  Sort by  
Post new topic Reply to topic  [ 12 posts ]  Go to page Previous  1, 2

All times are UTC [ DST ]

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: CBguy and 19 guests

You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot post attachments in this forum

Search for:
Jump to:  

About Us

Follow Retrobike

Other cool stuff

All content © 2005-2015 Retrobike unless otherwise stated.
Cookies Policy.
bikedeals - the best bike deals in one place
FatCOGS - Fat Chance Owner's Group

Powered by phpBB® Forum Software © phpBB Group