Anthony":39oofb62 said:It depends what setting the SID is on at the moment. A 2000 SID on the 63mm setting is the same length as a Judy SL, 43.5cm. On the 80mm setting, it is 17mm longer, so then it gives a head angle of about 1 degree less.
Yes, but so small that it would take a rider of your skill and sensitivity to notice it. I would be oblivious, as I am to most things.FluffyChicken":1k5qqzl5 said:Though looking at my 1995 Judy manual as reference Would the 80mm not run with a greater sag dialled in? So reducing that effective when riding head angle decrease?Anthony":1k5qqzl5 said:It depends what setting the SID is on at the moment. A 2000 SID on the 63mm setting is the same length as a Judy SL, 43.5cm. On the 80mm setting, it is 17mm longer, so then it gives a head angle of about 1 degree less.
so the dialled in sag isn't that much thenAnthony":2x9bf4wa said:Yes, but so small that it would take a rider of your skill and sensitivity to notice it. I would be oblivious, as I am to most things.FluffyChicken":2x9bf4wa said:Though looking at my 1995 Judy manual as reference Would the 80mm not run with a greater sag dialled in? So reducing that effective when riding head angle decrease?Anthony":2x9bf4wa said:It depends what setting the SID is on at the moment. A 2000 SID on the 63mm setting is the same length as a Judy SL, 43.5cm. On the 80mm setting, it is 17mm longer, so then it gives a head angle of about 1 degree less.