Your 10 post rule to vote is ridiculous

[tvcreative]

I really thing the whole 10 post rule to vote in your polls is a bunch of bullroar...

here's if my first post, my gift to you

 

[mtbdave]

never mind should get a few posts done on here!

welcome btw.

 

[orange71]

you've been on the site a whole year and haven't managed to make 10 posts? :? I don't think it's asking much.

 

[BoyBurning]

Bloody hell...

Some people REALLY want to vote for that Activator...


BB.

 

[drystonepaul]

I really thing the whole 10 post rule to vote in your polls is a bunch of bullroar...

here's if my first post, my gift to you

Fantastic first contribution. Well done.

 

[tintin40]

I really thing the whole 10 post rule to vote in your polls is a bunch of bullroar...

here's if my first post, my gift to you

Fantastic first contribution. Well done.

Agree. Nothing like saying 'Hi every one. Great site. But i think....'

:roll:

 

[daugs]

you've been on the site a whole year and haven't managed to make 10 posts? :? I don't think it's asking much.

I know another site that would ban you as a lurker for not contributing for a year, don't know this one well enough to comment but I would have thought the desire (and hence rule) is for people to have a feel for the site and to be sufficiently engaged before voting, doesn't seem that bad to me.

 

[markwashington]

Thanks for your erudite and dynamic input into the Retrobike community. I can't wait till you're actually allowed to vote :facepalm:

 

[Bob]

At least it's a different complaint, not the usuall moaning about not being able to post pics in a for sale ad from someone that's signed up to the site just to sell some bits then go again :roll:

 

[Raging_Bulls]

Agreed, the 10 post rule is ridiculous. I propose we up it to 50 posts.



In all seriousness, it stops people from creating extra accounts to vote on their own bike.