Weight and bikes capability

Stick Legs":pz1pctyw said:
The worlds best Clydesdale friendly seat posts are the Control Tech ones with the central rib though them. :wink:

The warranty was good when I bent them with massive leg power, or was it massive weight?

I am 6' tall and currently 16 1/2 st. As I said earlier have not been a well boy recently which included a spell on steroids. Put on 2st in 8 weeks. Aiming to get back my fitness and get back down below 15st. The illness I have is not very bike friendly as the day after a tough ride I am completely exhausted. Working at it and with some careful diet changes and moderate rides a few times a week. Will hopefully rejoin the RB Clydesdales soon.
 
BITD: Lots of riding and racing, little money for shiny things so indulged our hobby by cycling.

NOW: Lots of tea and cake while we search the internet / wait for postman / fit new shiny widget to bike we would have cut a bollock off for BITD. Not so much riding going on methinks!

I am the worst culrpit. :oops:
 
Dear Clydesdale Anonymous
While I am rapidly on my way to joining you there is a steel tubing that is excellent for the larger frame and has the side effect of being very good/excellent compared to other steel frames for the larger weight.
Look for a Columbus MAX OR framed bike, often found easily in a Kona Explosif from 1995 to 1997. Can be found elsewhere but you don't see them often and from earlier years.
Anyways, give it a try.
 
that weight chart is poo
it needs another 27.5kg on the end scale

so im quite big (6'3 and 125kg lots of muscle i might add :wink: ) and have always found cannondales take it well
the gt,s i have had not so well :oops:
my biggest problem has allways been snapping chains and wheel qr,s not holding tight enough and allowing the back wheel to slip on the chain side

Rob
 
Back
Top