Logic.Al":19dyj8mm said:Flex Stems IMO were scary. The bars are not supposed to move like that.
lewisfoto":3cl4rj66 said:Thanks for the ideas, As a point of clarification I am mainly interested in steel hardtail, rigid fork bikes and definitely musk be UK made.
ultrazenith":2qtybchj said:My next questions: were flex stems any good?
And the AMP front forks?
If you're going as fast as possible, you're stood up. If you're stood up, what good is a suspension seat post doing?ultrazenith":1mclna7q said:Were / are suspension seat posts any good for XC / all mountain (whatever that means) riders?
I ask because these days the name of the game seems to be getting as much shock absorption (as well as rolling resistance) as possible if one wants to be as fast as possible. Since most retro bikes can't take modern long travel forks, I'm wondering whether adding a flex stem, sus seat post and phatt tires to my rigid steel bike could be a good start.
With forks, it's the quality of travel rather than quantity - that said, if you have the same fork with an inch of difference in travel, the rougher the track, the more you are likely to notice it. And yes, rebounding like a pogo stick is not good!ultrazenith":1mclna7q said:Finally, I one more stupid question about suspension forks. Travel matters to some extent, clearly, as does rebound damping. But does having 70 mm instead of 100 of travel make much difference? And does it matter if the rebound it like a pogo stick (undamped), if the hits are nonetheless being absorbed by the fork?