The 'how much post is too much post' Erm, Post....

[Carsten]

The Rascal is the same too, right?

no, the Rascal is the same as the earlier MC1 Attitude but with the standard 1" head tube. those frames are heavier and have a different geometry than the MC2 era frames which use the Gradient tubes. i prefer the ride characteristic of the MC2 era frames.

Carsten

 

[Shamus]

Sorry for hijacking...but is there difference on geometries between -90 and -92 Attitudes?

I was yesterday riding with my -92 and it feels different than -90.
Older feels quicker on handling. Both are 20".

 

[Carsten]

Sorry for hijacking...but is there difference on geometries between -90 and -92 Attitudes?

I was yesterday riding with my -92 and it feels different than -90.
Older feels quicker on handling. Both are 20".

yes! the 90 'tude has a shorter top tube - 58.1cm compared to 59.4cm of the 91-93. seat tube angle is 73deg (90) and 72.5deg (91-93). head tube angle 71.5 and 71.0, respectively. fork rake is a little more on the 90 (3.8 vs 4.0cm).

Carsten

 

[shovelon]

I want to see the legs that use that post. :?: :?: :?: :shock: :shock:

 

[neilll]

That's better than an Ed Edwards post....and THAT is saying something

 

[Copey]

LOL, you don't want to see these legs!

36" inside leg though..

 

[Martin]

Well that´s a hughe seatpost you have got there.... :shock:

I´m 6 feet and 6 inches )we call it 1,95 meters and riding a 22`Attitude.

I´m using a syncros seatpost (420 mm I think right away) and my seathight is 85,5 cm in racingposition (like my roadbike and modern mountainbike).

 

[Copey]

THAT's WHAT I NEED RIGHT THERE..

Seriouslt, I am in the market for a 22" Attitude, or a 20" Pace RC200..

In fact, I'll post it in 'wanted' now..