Tatty Rockhopper vs tatty Lavadome - which would you keep

yellow-heapster

Dirt Disciple
My company has signed up to the ride2work scheme which means I soon get to take delivery of a shiny-new bike (a once every 2 decades experience for me). Unfortunately this means that I have to get rid of one of my existing bikes

One is a 1989 Rock Hopper Comp, the other a 1991 Lavadome. Both owned from new both a bit tatty. The Rockhooper is faster, the better ride and near 100% original (read more knackered) but the Lavadome has more kudos IMHO.

Which should I keep, which do I let go…

Oh and technically the Rockhopper is my wife’s bike but since getting a StumpJumper she has lost all interest in it.
 
Re: Tatty Rockhopper vs tatty Lavadome - which would you kee

yellow-heapster":2w7st8xy said:
One is a 1989 Rock Hopper Comp, the other a 1991 Lavadome. Both owned from new both a bit tatty. The Rockhooper is faster, the better ride and near 100% original (read more knackered) but the Lavadome has more kudos IMHO.

You answered your own question really, unless it won't get ridden when you get the new bike.
 
Unfortunately this means that I have to get rid of one of my existing bikes

I'm struggling to understand what that means ; all the words look familiar but I've never seen them arranged in that order before :?

What language is it ?
 
Sounds like the Specialized has everything going for it.

But why don't you ride one of your existing bikes to work; Keep both; Save lots of money.

TBH, if I had 2 retro bikes of that age, which I'd owned from new, I wouldn't be putting either of them up on Ebay, for a few pounds.

I once sold an old Kona that I'd ridden all over the world. Even with a WTB headset and P2 forks, It sold for peanuts (then subtract Ebay fees). It still haunts me. Never again.
 
Back
Top