- Feedback
- View
Reviving an old thread, definitely wonder how the orange prestige compares to the wicked in terms of ride, build quality ect

Reviving an old thread, definitely wonder how the orange prestige compares to the wicked in terms of ride, build quality ect
I just sold my 18 inch Kona cinder cone to a friend after rebuilding it, she and the bike are from 1992 and she loves it. To me it was nothing special. Very stable frame and very well made but bike felt heavy (10k5), also not so heavy but not springy. It’s all subjective. I might build a “hot” or hei hei when chance comes . I have a Lincoln Tange ultimate ultralight with a big seat tube and a big rigid fork. I have no idea what it is but it flies ! You definitely must think where you want to go because it goes there fast. And it cost me 100 euros and after removing the peeled varnish the frame had no rust (nickel plated) . And so what makes the difference? Some piles of rust are very expensive because of a faded sticker “Salsa” or “Fat Chance” . I really want to build a grassroots randonneur but I have not tried them so can’t compare a Wicked, an Ibis, a Salsa and an Orange prestige. Also I would be following the light wheels, narrow tires (1.8 or maximum 2) and use it to explore a mix of city and forest ..lots of dirt track but not much elevation. So why should I spend 3 times more for a Wicked frame or Salsa frame than an Orange and will I feel the same? It would be easier if I try some bikes, need toWell there were only 3 votes in the initial poll from 16 years ago (unless it was somehow reset). Let's see if we can increase that.