I'm not suggesting Scotland could not go it alone.
I am suggesting Salmond wouldn't be able to engineer it successfully. Indeed, I'd wager a friendly tenner to charity that the majority of voting Scots feel the same way and deny him the opportunity at the referendum.
Salmond says they'd be automatically part of the EU, because they would be applying while still inside it. Really? The EU say an independent Scotland would need to apply from scratch.
He rant on about 'Scotish' oil. Really? A third.of it is in English territorial waters, but Salmond chooses to ignore international conventions on national maritime entitlements and instead chooses to draw a horizontal line on the map across the North Sea, starting at the Scotish border. That's not how it works. The border continues into the sea at the angle it meets the coastline. And who does he think is going to do it out the sea bed if the Americans and British don't?
And he'd jolly well like to keep Sterling. Shame the Bank of England has said he can't, yet he still has to come up with a viable alternative.
He's undoubtedly charismatic and persuasive, but his grasp of Scotland's role in international affairs is massively flawed. He's a local politician trying to play on the World stage, but the rest of the World aren't very impressed. Every time he says "we'll do such and such with this country, that international organisation, this national department" the body in question almost always responds "erm, we don't think so". The Bank of England, The EU, NATO, and not an insignificant number of large companies all say "No Mr Salmond - you can not automatically join our organisation. You start at the bottom like anyone else".
The biggest impediment to Scotish independence will be Salmond himself, and the voters will tell him so next year beyond almost any shadow of a doubt.