Proto Manitou

Re:

I'd see about having it repaired and ride it tbh.

What makes this frame a prototype though??
 

Attachments

  • _20190903_082729.JPG
    _20190903_082729.JPG
    47.8 KB · Views: 2,624
Re: Re:

jimo746":174hfghb said:
I'd see about having it repaired and ride it tbh.

What makes this frame a prototype though??


I'd say he owns a dremel and added that himself :? All in all a huge pile of tat.
 
Re:

Not sure of the tubing used & not speaking of Manitou alone but many prototypes weren't heat treated as longevity wasn't a concern. Until now...…...
 
Re:

i own serial number 9, and build date and sn nummber is also hand written. it doesn't say "proto" on mine. never saw another until now.
 
Re: Re:

eejoor":z0a7or0a said:
i own serial number 9, and build date and sn nummber is also hand written. it doesn't say "proto" on mine. never saw another until now.
Perhaps you could post a picture of yours, so we can compare the hand writting :p .

Pip
 
Re:

The only thing that I could find has been Photobucketed:

eejoor":3cioibrl said:
....evidence for this is in the hand engraved serial number (fs0009) and build date (19/10/1992).

framenumber:

DSC_0484.jpg


Danny


Pip
 
Re:

Pip

All “normal” ones come out with a BB shell engraved like this

Of course if the early ones with M2’s on the backend we’re blank then anyone could grab a dremell and piss about

Here’s mine - which is a year older and Manitou III makes dating them a precise science


The weld on the for sale one is a tad agricultural compared to the stacked 5p coins on mine

I’m sitting on the fence here - yet to be convinced it anything other than a cracked bike you can’t ride and an expensive ornament with a mosh-mash of parts
 

Attachments

  • 68253682-73F1-4001-80F5-AE904220237C.jpeg
    68253682-73F1-4001-80F5-AE904220237C.jpeg
    75.1 KB · Views: 2,314
Back
Top