marker":qw4g812s said:I like the fork suggestion and could be a good starting point.
Was the Pace rc35 around in 94?
You're disagreeing with yourself cos it was a chubby fingered Apple typo. I just meant XT but for some reason crapple auto corrects it to XT9.secret_squirrel":1xhfpp91 said:Chopper1192":1xhfpp91 said:Unless your frame was built for racing then XT9 maintains the period ethos you seek.
Disagree. XT9 is nowhere near "period" for a 1994 frame.
8 speed XT with Compact Drive M737 is the way to go - new that year.
If Canti's give you the shivers a light stretch to 1996's M739 and V's is permitted, or alternatively magura's or an early disc brake.
Chopper1192":3092bdwi said:You're disagreeing with yourself cos it was a chubby fingered Apple typo. I just meant XT but for some reason crapple auto corrects it to XT9.secret_squirrel":3092bdwi said:Chopper1192":3092bdwi said:Unless your frame was built for racing then XT9 maintains the period ethos you seek.
Disagree. XT9 is nowhere near "period" for a 1994 frame.
8 speed XT with Compact Drive M737 is the way to go - new that year.
If Canti's give you the shivers a light stretch to 1996's M739 and V's is permitted, or alternatively magura's or an early disc brake.
Archemist":6mk0oioz said:marker":6mk0oioz said:I like the fork suggestion and could be a good starting point.
Was the Pace rc35 around in 94?
Yes you're looking a monobox crossover time 35 MXC's and MXCD's (and so a relatively decent amount of travel). Justbackdated (tim) is the god of pace.![]()
gunner":3ac8e3lg said:Archemist":3ac8e3lg said:marker":3ac8e3lg said:I like the fork suggestion and could be a good starting point.
Was the Pace rc35 around in 94?
Yes you're looking a monobox crossover time 35 MXC's and MXCD's (and so a relatively decent amount of travel). Justbackdated (tim) is the god of pace.![]()
My '94 bike came with RC35 XCS rather than the later monobox. Not saying the monobox would be wrong though.
FluffyChicken":jw9gs0dv said:1994 was XCS
1995 was MXC