Anthony":2n6e2hoj said:Yes, it's a 1995 O-Beam, which differs quite a lot from the 94. They kept this more minimalist (but slightly heavier) design from 95 to 98.its_kirby":2n6e2hoj said:That post isn't an o-beam tho is it?
I'm sorry, perhaps you meant it says Race Light on it - yes, it's a Race Light O-Beam! Which is a straight post, whereas the lay-back posts on the lower models were called plain Race Light.its_kirby":lkl0f5ks said:That post isn't an o-beam tho is it?
Anthony":34e0o8ej said:What a shame to break up such an original bike. And much though I like Flites, they look (and are) wrong on an O-Beam seat post. The rails are too shallow, so the clamp is very close to / occasionally actually touching the business part of the saddle. I didn't ever find it uncomfortable, but it was wearing the saddle. Still you'll have saved a few grammes I suppose.
Gruff":33cfc14u said:Gotta agree with Anthony.
If you didn't get on with it then you could have kept it & just fitted another. Then if you ever did want to sell the bike then you would still have the original spec![]()
Gruff":1jqzyftc said:Fair enough Barney knew you must have a reason![]()