Not wearing that one piece you had on at Mayhem the other year. :shock:daj":o2w6kmnw said:Gotta see it to believe it !!! :shock: :shock:
Not wearing that one piece you had on at Mayhem the other year. :shock:daj":o2w6kmnw said:Gotta see it to believe it !!! :shock: :shock:
daj":2rotpfsm said:
LEJOG?grumpycommuter":1km379uo said:Not wanting to hijack the thread but do you want to go for a spin soon to work of the 'excess'?
NeilM":jwibiy0x said:LEJOG?grumpycommuter":jwibiy0x said:Not wanting to hijack the thread but do you want to go for a spin soon to work of the 'excess'?
JamesM":1kp9m6u6 said:If you look the sections are Retro MTB 97, Retro Classic Road and Bike Chat 98. So the 98 section is for any bike from 98 on, mtb or road. That's how I've always viewed it and I've seen plenty of posts concerning modern road stuff in the 98 section.
I feel the same.T'boo Ted":a7p9jr24 said:It feels like it is post 98 mtb and for road stuff it's like er...don't realy know where to put this, so i'll post here and hope it doesn't ruffle the feathers.
"I think it has something to do with freedom of choice."Raging_Bulls":v58uzsy0 said:EDIT : more to the point, why are you riding modern road bikes? Are the retro ones not good enough?
Raging_Bulls":29p33idc said:JamesM is right, modern road bikes go in the 98+ section.
While I do understand that road bikes and MTBs are not the same, if we have to split up 98+ in road and MTB parts, there will be too little going on to make either section even remotely interesting.
EDIT : more to the point, why are you riding modern road bikes? Are the retro ones not good enough?